France
France-HiT
France-HiT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
174<br />
Health systems in transition <br />
<strong>France</strong><br />
in designing health policy and in the management of health agencies and other<br />
institutions. Overall, this reform, while addressing important issues in the<br />
system, mostly draws upon previously proposed measures and mechanisms<br />
with very little innovation.<br />
Coping with the growing demand for long-term care for the elderly:<br />
reform to prevent and provide for loss of autonomy<br />
The first part of a two-step plan to address loss of autonomy (projet de loi<br />
relatif à l’adaptation de la société au vieillissement) is expected to be enacted<br />
by the end of 2015 and to be operational by mid-2016. The first step focuses<br />
on measures designed to facilitate ageing in place, with the key measure<br />
consisting of increased ceilings and reduced individual financial participation<br />
under the APA (see section 3.6) to pay for assistance at home for an estimated<br />
700 000 dependent frail elderly individuals. Other provisions of the proposed<br />
law include financing of measures to prevent and delay the loss of autonomy;<br />
adaptation of housing options, from new technologies for automation in<br />
private homes to modernization of nonmedical collective housing facilities,<br />
renamed autonomy residences (résidences autonomie; see section 5.8.1); and<br />
respite assistance for caregivers. These measures will be financed by CASA<br />
(enacted in 2013 as described above), which is estimated to raise €645 million<br />
per year. However, most of the 2013 and 2014 revenues raised were not kept<br />
for the reform but channelled to cover deficits in an unrelated social security<br />
programme. Starting in 2015, the CASA revenues should be fully dedicated to<br />
financing the autonomy reform.<br />
The second step of the reform will focus on institutional care, in particular<br />
reducing OOP payments for nursing home residents. Once more, the most<br />
significant challenge will be finding the revenues to finance expanded public<br />
coverage of institutional care. There is actually no political declaration on<br />
suggested mechanisms and one can wonder if this will remain a “ghost reform”<br />
after more than a decade of promised long-term care financing reforms that<br />
were repeatedly delayed and ultimately not acted upon.