France
France-HiT
France-HiT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
44<br />
Health systems in transition <br />
<strong>France</strong><br />
of the technology (intérêt de santé publique), which includes epidemiological<br />
aspects and quality of life. The degree of medical benefit or therapeutic value<br />
is represented by two assessments: SMR for drugs and one for devices and<br />
medical procedures (service attendu). These two are evaluated in absolute terms<br />
for all different types of use. The assessment informs decisions on coverage and<br />
the coverage rate, from 0 to 100% (see section 2.8.4).<br />
Is the technology more effective than the available comparators? An<br />
assessment is made of the relative medical benefit of the technology in<br />
comparison with similar available treatments, termed the improvement in the<br />
relative medical benefit (amélioration du service medical rendu; ASMR) for<br />
medicines or the improvement in expected benefit (amelioration du service<br />
attendu; ASA) for medical devices and procedures. There is an explicit<br />
pricing decision based on the grade given by the drug or the device committee<br />
(Transparency Commission or CNEDIMTS) depending upon the improvement<br />
in medical effectiveness over the existing comparators (rated on a scale from 1<br />
for major improvement, usually assigned to life-saving technologies, to 5 for no<br />
improvement) (see section 2.8.4). Manufacturers have an incentive to provide<br />
sufficient data to assess drugs and devices because of the pricing objective.<br />
Technologies are reassessed every five years based on the documents<br />
provided by the manufacturer and on systematic reviews of the literature.<br />
Starting in October 2013, an economic evaluation has become a part of<br />
the assessment or reassessment of drugs and medical devices under certain<br />
circumstances. The HAS Commission for Economic Evaluation and Public<br />
Health (Commission d’Évaluation Économique et de Santé Publique; CEESP)<br />
undertakes an economic evaluation if:<br />
• the product or technology is being initially assessed or confirmed as<br />
having an ASMR/ASA level 1, 2 or 3; and<br />
• the product or technology may significantly affect SHI expenditure, given<br />
its impact on the organization of health services, professional practices or<br />
conditions of coverage of patients and, if appropriate, its price; or<br />
• if the provisional or actual turnover for the product after two years on the<br />
market is €20 million or higher.<br />
For other technologies, such as the equipment required for a procedure,<br />
reports are commissioned by the Ministry in charge of Health. The HTA<br />
report may recommend waiting until additional information is available or<br />
may commission surveys or observational studies. The manufacturer is usually