06.03.2016 Views

France

France-HiT

France-HiT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

Health systems in transition <br />

<strong>France</strong><br />

of the technology (intérêt de santé publique), which includes epidemiological<br />

aspects and quality of life. The degree of medical benefit or therapeutic value<br />

is represented by two assessments: SMR for drugs and one for devices and<br />

medical procedures (service attendu). These two are evaluated in absolute terms<br />

for all different types of use. The assessment informs decisions on coverage and<br />

the coverage rate, from 0 to 100% (see section 2.8.4).<br />

Is the technology more effective than the available comparators? An<br />

assessment is made of the relative medical benefit of the technology in<br />

comparison with similar available treatments, termed the improvement in the<br />

relative medical benefit (amélioration du service medical rendu; ASMR) for<br />

medicines or the improvement in expected benefit (amelioration du service<br />

attendu; ASA) for medical devices and procedures. There is an explicit<br />

pricing decision based on the grade given by the drug or the device committee<br />

(Transparency Commission or CNEDIMTS) depending upon the improvement<br />

in medical effectiveness over the existing comparators (rated on a scale from 1<br />

for major improvement, usually assigned to life-saving technologies, to 5 for no<br />

improvement) (see section 2.8.4). Manufacturers have an incentive to provide<br />

sufficient data to assess drugs and devices because of the pricing objective.<br />

Technologies are reassessed every five years based on the documents<br />

provided by the manufacturer and on systematic reviews of the literature.<br />

Starting in October 2013, an economic evaluation has become a part of<br />

the assessment or reassessment of drugs and medical devices under certain<br />

circumstances. The HAS Commission for Economic Evaluation and Public<br />

Health (Commission d’Évaluation Économique et de Santé Publique; CEESP)<br />

undertakes an economic evaluation if:<br />

• the product or technology is being initially assessed or confirmed as<br />

having an ASMR/ASA level 1, 2 or 3; and<br />

• the product or technology may significantly affect SHI expenditure, given<br />

its impact on the organization of health services, professional practices or<br />

conditions of coverage of patients and, if appropriate, its price; or<br />

• if the provisional or actual turnover for the product after two years on the<br />

market is €20 million or higher.<br />

For other technologies, such as the equipment required for a procedure,<br />

reports are commissioned by the Ministry in charge of Health. The HTA<br />

report may recommend waiting until additional information is available or<br />

may commission surveys or observational studies. The manufacturer is usually

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!