02.11.2016 Views

UNDERGRADUATE

Ycb5305N2JX

Ycb5305N2JX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with a literal death, but more the death of a marriage<br />

as Sally discovers her husband’s infidelity. This lack of<br />

gruesome detail may seem like a drastic departure from<br />

the original, but Atwood’s version is nothing compared to<br />

that of Oates. Rather than have her heroine go through the<br />

forbidden door, the protagonist in “Blue-Bearded Lover”<br />

does not enter the chamber at all. Instead, she chooses<br />

to live her life with Bluebeard and bear his children. This<br />

act reveals the calculating nature of this wife, who would<br />

rather choose to live with evil than attempt to open the<br />

door. In this way, Oates’ protagonist is able to conquer the<br />

figure of Bluebeard and truly take control of her own tale,<br />

even if her actions might seem just as despicable as her<br />

husband’s to the reader. Of the tales authored by women,<br />

the one that perhaps is most true to the original is Carter’s<br />

“The Bloody Chamber,” which may seem surprising since<br />

it is closer to a novella than a fairy tale, which readers<br />

would assume leaves more room for reinterpretation.<br />

While staying true to many of the plot points, Carter<br />

choses to explore areas such as sexuality, female agency<br />

and the effects of poverty on a marriage decision.<br />

These three versions of “Bluebeard” are quite different<br />

from each other, while at the same time being recognizable<br />

as stemming from the same tale. 5 This quick detailing<br />

of these reinterpretations managed to point out the<br />

ways in which the tales were different from the original<br />

“Bluebeard” and from each other; however, what it failed<br />

to mention were the ways in which they are all extremely<br />

similar. Many of the issues changed in these tales revolve<br />

around the female protagonist’s gender and the assets or<br />

limitations that come from it. Part of this similarity could<br />

be explained by the fact that all these authors are largely<br />

famous, all born in the late 1930’s and all white women<br />

who are residing or resided in the United States, Canada<br />

and Europe. Another part of the reason for this intense<br />

focus on the gender of the female protagonists and<br />

5 Fairy tales that all exhibit the same themes and plot summary can<br />

be found using the Aarne-Thompson-Uther classification system.<br />

“Bluebeard” and its variations are considered to be ATU 312 tale types.<br />

little else could come from the field of feminist fairy tale<br />

criticism itself, which had for so long been inundated with<br />

a heavy focus on gender, at the expense of other identities.<br />

While the field of fairy tale criticism had been in existence<br />

for quite some time, feminist fairy tale criticism did<br />

not occur until the beginning of the second wave of<br />

feminism. 6 It was in 1970 that Alison Lurie published<br />

the article that would lead to the creation of the field, by<br />

claiming fairy tales were beneficial to young girls. 7 Lurie<br />

comes out strongly on the side of both folk and fairy tales,<br />

arguing that they are full of strong female characters,<br />

hidden in popular and less popular stories. It is due<br />

to the male domination of the literary world, through<br />

careful selection, editing and publication of only certain<br />

tales that women had been keep in the dark for so long<br />

about these female characters, ripe for idolization. Lurie<br />

advocates not for the tales that we might be familiar with<br />

today, but instead “traditional” tales, which she claims<br />

are “exactly the sort of subversive literature of which a<br />

feminist should approve.” 8 This sparked a rebuttal from<br />

Marcia R. Lieberman, who fundamentally disagreed with<br />

Lurie, a move that started what is now termed the Lurie-<br />

Lieberman debate. 9 Lieberman’s article claimed that it<br />

did not matter if there existed obscure female role models<br />

hidden away in neglected fairy tales. These are not the<br />

characters that young girls learn of when undergoing the<br />

process of what it means to be a woman in the United<br />

States. Lieberman writes: “Only the best-known stories,<br />

those that everyone has read or heard, indeed, those that<br />

Disney has popularized, have affected masses of children<br />

in our culture.” 10 She goes on to argue that fairy tales do<br />

the work of teaching young girls that the best thing in<br />

6 This section would not be complete without giving credit to Haase’s<br />

“Feminist Fairy Tale Scholarship,” 15-63. The scope of his survey covers<br />

much more than is mentioned in this paper and I would direct those<br />

further interested there.<br />

7 Lurie, Don’t Tell the Grown-Ups. Parts of this book are a revision of Lurie’s<br />

earlier article “Fairy Tale Liberation,” 42-44.<br />

8 Ibid., 19.<br />

9 Lieberman, “‘Some Day My Prince Will Come,’” 383-4.<br />

10 Ibid., 383-4.<br />

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!