02.11.2016 Views

UNDERGRADUATE

Ycb5305N2JX

Ycb5305N2JX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

counterculture. The efforts of the flower power movement<br />

are positively represented: we find the innocent flower<br />

child on the right easier to empathize with than the<br />

faceless Guard on the left. The photograph validates<br />

the voices of those in opposition to the war. Beyond this<br />

historical moment, it also encourages the public to speak<br />

out in times of conflict. This image also emotional not<br />

only because of the interaction between Kasmir and the<br />

faceless Guard, but for the events we imagine occurring<br />

before and after the photo as well. As we will see with the<br />

photographs taken during Russia’s Orange Revolution and<br />

the more recent riots in Romania, these pictures embody<br />

comparable emotional and semiotic scenarios. Lastly,<br />

contradictions and crises are at the center of this picture,<br />

as represented by the emotional bodies and semiotic<br />

meaning of various compositional elements. The good,<br />

physically defenseless girl on the right promotes peace,<br />

while the evil, armed and protected National Guard seems<br />

to represent a fight for what they think is justice. This<br />

image selectively depicts one aspect and one perspective<br />

of the war, perhaps oversimplifying the seemingly twodimensional<br />

forces framed in such stark opposition.<br />

As I looked for information about this photograph,<br />

searching for terms such as flower, woman, peace, in<br />

various combinations, I came across a handful of other<br />

photos. These images interestingly mimic certain physical<br />

elements of the original “Flower Child at the Pentagon", as<br />

well as build on this iconic photograph’s visual rhetoric.<br />

By mimicking this image that is already recognized as<br />

representative of a certain era, and communicative of<br />

a specific ideology, that of peace, these other images<br />

are able to create a new, richer meaning of their own.<br />

Additionally, they create a dialogue between their own<br />

perspective, similar images emerging in times of chaos,<br />

and with the original itself.<br />

Flower Power<br />

Photographer Bernie Boston took a similar photo, Flower<br />

Power, in nearly the same time and space as “Flower<br />

Child at the Pentagon"—October 21, 1967, at a March on<br />

the Pentagon. 2 It is also in black and white, and depicts<br />

a man in a turtleneck sweater who places carnations<br />

down the barrels of soldiers’ rifles. The soldiers appear<br />

as anonymous as they did in “Flower Child", making it<br />

easy to understand the protesters as simply victims to<br />

this overpowering, ruthless, faceless war. The soldiers<br />

are only helmets, uniforms, and weapons. Other people<br />

stand behind the flowering man. They are unarmed,<br />

and seem to curiously peer into the crowd of soldiers.<br />

Interestingly, the man is also on the right, in the position<br />

of the benevolent side of this photograph. We do not see<br />

his face, however. He turns away from the camera and to<br />

our left. Kasmir is not alone, even though she appears<br />

to be in “Flower Child at the Pentagon". Other people<br />

at the same event that day similarly share flowers with<br />

the soldiers outside of the Pentagon. Both photographs<br />

capture the innocent flower child on the right, offering<br />

indicators of the movement they represent to the armed<br />

soldiers. These photographs serve as an American<br />

memory that conveys the conflict between the anti-war<br />

counterculture and the Vietnam War.<br />

Despite these apparent similarities, there are noteworthy<br />

differences that separate these two pictures, leading to<br />

one being more iconic than the other. For one, the framing<br />

of this second picture is noticeably more unconventional<br />

and nontraditional than “Flower Child". The camera faces<br />

downwards, capturing the tops of protesters’ and soldiers’<br />

heads. This framing disrupts our ability to emotionally<br />

relate to the image’s subject. We do not have the same<br />

intimacy with the subject as we did with Kasmir. We saw<br />

her eyes and her unique expression; here, the young man’s<br />

eyes are covered by his hair, and he is less vulnerable,<br />

surrounded by other protesters. The soldiers are also less<br />

intimidating. Rather than being uniformly lined up, they<br />

are scattered and unorganized. While this image certainly<br />

captures a similar crisis as “Flower Child at the Pentagon"<br />

and to some degree emotional and semiotic scenarios, it<br />

2 Flower Child can be viewed here:<br />

http://www.famouspictures.org/flower-power/.<br />

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!