02.11.2016 Views

UNDERGRADUATE

Ycb5305N2JX

Ycb5305N2JX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

closest bayonet is visible. The soldier standing next to<br />

him wears a helmet, and we barely see a few identifiable<br />

facial features in his profile: slightly squinted eyes, a nose,<br />

and an expressionless mouth. The next man’s face is less<br />

distinguishable. Beyond him, everyone turns into a hazy<br />

line of helmets and sheathed bayonets.<br />

French photographer Marc Riboud photographed<br />

the woman, Jan Rose Kasmir, at an anti-war rally in<br />

Washington D.C. on October 21st, 1967. At the time she was<br />

just seventeen and a high school student (Curry). People<br />

gathered around the Pentagon to protest the Vietnam War<br />

effort by exemplifying the ideology they promoted, one<br />

of peace and non-violence, which was termed the flower<br />

power movement by poet Allen Ginsberg (Curry). Antiwar<br />

protesters dressed in flower patterns and bright colors to<br />

identify themselves as “flower children.” Demonstrators,<br />

embracing the term, would also pass out flowers, carry<br />

bells, and sometimes chant mantras. The event later<br />

became known as the March on the Pentagon, and would<br />

come to serve as an U.S. public memory of the Vietnam<br />

War, and of the counterculture involving the flower power<br />

movement that accompanied this time period.<br />

The seemingly endless line of sheathed bayonets gives<br />

the viewer a sense that the girl on the right is quite<br />

outnumbered. This line of weapons also seems to stand<br />

in for the overwhelming presence that the Vietnam War<br />

had in the U.S. at this time. Yet, the lone Kasmir seems<br />

unafraid in front of these soldiers. Her innocent figure and<br />

flower offering contrast the line of destructive, mechanical<br />

tools. The National Guard’s sheathed bayonets and guns<br />

threaten the protesters’ safety, most urgently Kasmir’s.<br />

They have the means to attack if need be they seem to say.<br />

Their helmets demonstrate their preparation to protect<br />

themselves in the potential combat, something that the<br />

woman in the flower-print dress on the right seems far<br />

from ready to do. Yet, we feel confident that Kasmir can<br />

hold her ground. She attempts to engage with the Guard.<br />

She is not passive. She approaches them and offers a<br />

flower. The image forces us to wonder what she says to<br />

them, as she tries to get their attention with her daisy.<br />

The almost entirely faceless soldiers reflect an inhumane<br />

force of war. The men melt together. We see weapons,<br />

bodies, and helmets. The image manages to capture the<br />

overwhelming presence that the war had in the U.S. at<br />

this time, as well as the innocence of the peace promoting<br />

flower power movement. In this way, the photograph and<br />

Kasmir herself reflects the contradictions in the response<br />

to the war. Kasmir recalls, “It wasn’t a war machine, it<br />

was just a bunch of guys with orders. Right then, it went<br />

from being a fun, hip trip to a painful reality.” The March<br />

on the Pentagon did not end in the peace that this photo<br />

captures, however. Later that day the National Guard<br />

and the protesters succumbed to violence, and hundreds<br />

of protesters were arrested and hurt. Interestingly, the<br />

same people who fought for the National Guard were also<br />

civilians. The nation both protects and attacks its citizens<br />

with its own citizens.<br />

“Flower Child at the Pentagon" embodies the qualities that<br />

Hariman and Lucaites offer to help us understand iconic<br />

photographs. First, the photo is aesthetically familiar.<br />

The subject, Kasmir, is in focus and framed slightly to the<br />

right. The photograph follows the rule of thirds, in which<br />

the photographer imagines the image as divided into nine<br />

equal parts, where the important subjects or compositional<br />

elements are aligned on one of the imaginary horizontal<br />

or vertical lines or intersections. In addition to familiar<br />

composition, the semiotic transcriptions are conventional<br />

in U.S. culture. For example, the body offering the flower is<br />

a woman. This is largely in line with traditional American<br />

values and representations of femininity. Flowers too are<br />

symbols of femininity, peace, and beauty. And she seems<br />

to offer the flower in supplication or prayer. Where she<br />

seems to delicately hold the flower, the soldier grasps the<br />

barrel of the rifle. The sun’s reflection almost intensifies<br />

or sharpens the grip. While Kasmir is not passive in the<br />

image, she is certainly peaceful and seemingly nurturing,<br />

looking out for the well-being of others. This image<br />

performs civic and public memory by capturing the<br />

conflict between the National Guard and flower power<br />

148 CREATING KNOWLEDGE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!