UNDERGRADUATE
Ycb5305N2JX
Ycb5305N2JX
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
enslaved individuals and in essence defines them by their<br />
“otherness” to the point where they are stripped of any<br />
markers of autonomy. Whereas other citizens were given<br />
rights to employment for pay, property, and representation<br />
in politics, slaves were socialized to endure brutal<br />
treatment from birth in a process called natal alienation,<br />
where young children were taken from their families and<br />
forced to labor as individuals without the support of a<br />
community of origin.<br />
Another right denied to the enslaved was marriage, and<br />
most romantic relationships between slaves were classified<br />
as illegitimate unions by social mores. The History records a<br />
few notable relationships that Prince had with men living in<br />
her immediate context in Antigua, including a ship captain<br />
and a merchant (both unnamed); Adam White, who was<br />
a free man and a cooper; and her husband, Daniel James.<br />
Prince records how during the tumultuousness of her time<br />
with the Wood family in Antigua, she would ask her male<br />
companions to purchase her freedom from Mr. Wood. She<br />
recalls how after one particularly intense argument with her<br />
mistress, her master “flew into a passion: but he did not beat<br />
me then; he only abused and swore at me; and then gave me<br />
a note and bade me go and look for an owner” (Prince 71).<br />
However, when Prince’s companions offer to pay Mr. Wood<br />
for her freedom, he point-blank refuses to do so, which<br />
then calls into question the reasons for his threatening her<br />
sale; these were not genuine offers but rather cruel forms<br />
of punishment and social control. In reference to the same<br />
incident, Prince asserts that “he did this to please his wife<br />
and to frighten me” (Prince 71). This push-and-pull approach<br />
that Mr. Wood employs when dealing with Prince becomes<br />
a theme throughout the narrative; all through the rest of<br />
The History, and afterwards as the supplementary material<br />
attests, Mr. Wood continues his policy of threatening to<br />
undermine the relationships she has with the people around<br />
her by selling her to a random merchant.<br />
As Prince creates these relationships with other people for<br />
whom there is mutual gain in working for her freedom, she<br />
thereby forges a support network that directly undermines<br />
the oppression of the Woods. Prince demonstrates in the<br />
narrative the ability to produce a community not only among<br />
people who are enslaved alongside her, but also with many<br />
who are free, befriending free whites and free blacks living<br />
in the colonies alike. In aligning herself with the enslaved,<br />
she emphasizes a sense of community drawn from mutual<br />
experience of surviving oppression; in gathering allies<br />
from among the free, she situates herself in an intermediary<br />
position between the free and the enslaved, which suggests<br />
a commitment to establishing a community whose ingroup<br />
included a far wider spectrum of experience than was<br />
culturally practiced in traditional mores.<br />
When Prince arranges her official sale to someone she<br />
trusts, this action becomes an example of her exercising<br />
autonomy and power over her situation despite being<br />
still legally considered in bondage. Wood’s refusal to<br />
acknowledge potential buyers whom he sees Prince trust<br />
and who evidently would be far better to Prince than he<br />
and his family had ever been, makes clear how Wood tries<br />
to leverage this community bond against her. The threat<br />
to tear a person away from his or her family or community<br />
is a method of social control that, even if only a threat and<br />
not followed through, is devastating. This is especially true<br />
for the enslaved, whose very status in society made them a<br />
target for abuse without reprisal. The dependence on a local<br />
community that would protect an individual slave as much<br />
as possible was therefore used to manipulate slaves into<br />
compliance, for if slave masters knew they could punish<br />
someone by punishing her family, her friends, or even just<br />
other people she knew, the masters would hold this fact<br />
over their slaves and torture others in order to hurt someone<br />
else. This problem becomes complicated many times over<br />
after Prince leaves the Wood household after they travel<br />
to London, and despite her no longer living with them as a<br />
slave, Wood’s refusal to grant formal manumission renders<br />
Prince effectually in exile from her husband and community<br />
back in the West Indies.<br />
In a striking example of her oppressor’s irascibility, the<br />
narrative describes how Wood animatedly rejects the offer<br />
48 CREATING KNOWLEDGE