02.11.2016 Views

UNDERGRADUATE

Ycb5305N2JX

Ycb5305N2JX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

enslaved individuals and in essence defines them by their<br />

“otherness” to the point where they are stripped of any<br />

markers of autonomy. Whereas other citizens were given<br />

rights to employment for pay, property, and representation<br />

in politics, slaves were socialized to endure brutal<br />

treatment from birth in a process called natal alienation,<br />

where young children were taken from their families and<br />

forced to labor as individuals without the support of a<br />

community of origin.<br />

Another right denied to the enslaved was marriage, and<br />

most romantic relationships between slaves were classified<br />

as illegitimate unions by social mores. The History records a<br />

few notable relationships that Prince had with men living in<br />

her immediate context in Antigua, including a ship captain<br />

and a merchant (both unnamed); Adam White, who was<br />

a free man and a cooper; and her husband, Daniel James.<br />

Prince records how during the tumultuousness of her time<br />

with the Wood family in Antigua, she would ask her male<br />

companions to purchase her freedom from Mr. Wood. She<br />

recalls how after one particularly intense argument with her<br />

mistress, her master “flew into a passion: but he did not beat<br />

me then; he only abused and swore at me; and then gave me<br />

a note and bade me go and look for an owner” (Prince 71).<br />

However, when Prince’s companions offer to pay Mr. Wood<br />

for her freedom, he point-blank refuses to do so, which<br />

then calls into question the reasons for his threatening her<br />

sale; these were not genuine offers but rather cruel forms<br />

of punishment and social control. In reference to the same<br />

incident, Prince asserts that “he did this to please his wife<br />

and to frighten me” (Prince 71). This push-and-pull approach<br />

that Mr. Wood employs when dealing with Prince becomes<br />

a theme throughout the narrative; all through the rest of<br />

The History, and afterwards as the supplementary material<br />

attests, Mr. Wood continues his policy of threatening to<br />

undermine the relationships she has with the people around<br />

her by selling her to a random merchant.<br />

As Prince creates these relationships with other people for<br />

whom there is mutual gain in working for her freedom, she<br />

thereby forges a support network that directly undermines<br />

the oppression of the Woods. Prince demonstrates in the<br />

narrative the ability to produce a community not only among<br />

people who are enslaved alongside her, but also with many<br />

who are free, befriending free whites and free blacks living<br />

in the colonies alike. In aligning herself with the enslaved,<br />

she emphasizes a sense of community drawn from mutual<br />

experience of surviving oppression; in gathering allies<br />

from among the free, she situates herself in an intermediary<br />

position between the free and the enslaved, which suggests<br />

a commitment to establishing a community whose ingroup<br />

included a far wider spectrum of experience than was<br />

culturally practiced in traditional mores.<br />

When Prince arranges her official sale to someone she<br />

trusts, this action becomes an example of her exercising<br />

autonomy and power over her situation despite being<br />

still legally considered in bondage. Wood’s refusal to<br />

acknowledge potential buyers whom he sees Prince trust<br />

and who evidently would be far better to Prince than he<br />

and his family had ever been, makes clear how Wood tries<br />

to leverage this community bond against her. The threat<br />

to tear a person away from his or her family or community<br />

is a method of social control that, even if only a threat and<br />

not followed through, is devastating. This is especially true<br />

for the enslaved, whose very status in society made them a<br />

target for abuse without reprisal. The dependence on a local<br />

community that would protect an individual slave as much<br />

as possible was therefore used to manipulate slaves into<br />

compliance, for if slave masters knew they could punish<br />

someone by punishing her family, her friends, or even just<br />

other people she knew, the masters would hold this fact<br />

over their slaves and torture others in order to hurt someone<br />

else. This problem becomes complicated many times over<br />

after Prince leaves the Wood household after they travel<br />

to London, and despite her no longer living with them as a<br />

slave, Wood’s refusal to grant formal manumission renders<br />

Prince effectually in exile from her husband and community<br />

back in the West Indies.<br />

In a striking example of her oppressor’s irascibility, the<br />

narrative describes how Wood animatedly rejects the offer<br />

48 CREATING KNOWLEDGE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!