Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science
Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science
Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
it, but is itself the 'inclusive whole' which is the required connectedness<br />
<strong>of</strong> 'many in one'.<br />
In this I thoroughly agree, holding that the connectedness <strong>of</strong> things is<br />
nothing else than the togetherness <strong>of</strong> things in occasions <strong>of</strong> experience.<br />
Of course, such occasions are only rarely occasions <strong>of</strong> human experience.<br />
Curiously enough Hume also agrees. For his only togetherness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stream <strong>of</strong> impressions <strong>of</strong> sensation, which in his doctrine are distinct<br />
existences at distinct times, lies in the 'gentle force' <strong>of</strong> association<br />
which must lie wholly within an occasion <strong>of</strong> experience. This is also one<br />
aspect <strong>of</strong> Kant's doctrine, that the occasions <strong>of</strong> experience provide the<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> connectedness.<br />
Of course there are important differences between all these doctrines.<br />
But they agree in their general principle - to look on occasions <strong>of</strong><br />
experience as the ground <strong>of</strong> connectedness.<br />
Section XIII. Also Leibniz can find no other connectedness between<br />
reals except that lying wholly within the individual experiences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
monads, including the Supreme Monad. He employed the terms<br />
'perception' <strong>and</strong> 'apperception' for the lower <strong>and</strong> higher way in which one<br />
108