Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science

ideas of substance or subject, two main metaphysical traditions of European
philosophical history, two main principles. These substances and these subjects
are two immaterial bodies which were considered by traditional European
metaphysics as lying, as a sort of core, inside the objects or underlying the
empirical reality of our world. The first European scientist who saw with his
inner eye the forces between two things had been Michael Faraday (1791-
1867). Faraday was an English scientist who contributed to the fields of
electromagnetism. Later physicists like Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Erwin
Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg and others followed his view in modern
physics. This is a fifth point of my work. I compare Nagarjuna with European
scientific modes of thought for a better understanding of Asia. I do not
compare Nagarjuna with European philosophers like Hegel, Heidegger,
Wittgenstein. The principles and metaphysical foundations of physical sciences
are more representative for European modes of thought than the ideas of
Hegel, Heidegger and Wittgenstein and they are more precise. And slowly we
are beginning to understand these principles.
Let me take as an example the interpretation of quantum entanglement by the
British mathematician Roger Penrose. Penrose discusses in the year of 2000
the experiences of quantum entanglement where light is separated over a
distance of 100 kilometers and still remains connected in an unknown way.
These are well known experiments in the last 30 years. Very strange for
European modes of thought. The light should be either separated or
connected. That is the expectation most European modes of thought tell us.
Aristotle had been the first. Aristotle (384 - 322 Before Current Era) was a
Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and a teacher of Alexander the Great.