03.12.2016 Views

Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science

Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science

Christian Thomas Kohl The Metaphysical Foundations of Buddhism and Modern Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> the civilized thought <strong>of</strong> the epoch in question. <strong>The</strong>y are intuitions<br />

which, apart from their use in science, ordinary language rarely<br />

expresses in any defined accuracy, but habitually presupposes in its<br />

current words <strong>and</strong> expressions. For example, the words 'tables', 'chairs',<br />

'rocks', presuppose the scientific notion <strong>of</strong> material bodies, which has<br />

governed natural science from the seventeenth century to the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nineteenth.<br />

But, even from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the special sciences, philosophic<br />

systems with their ambitious aims at full comprehensiveness, are not<br />

useless. <strong>The</strong>y are the way in which the human spirit cultivates its deeper<br />

intuitions. Such systems give life <strong>and</strong> motion to detached thoughts. Apart<br />

from these efforts at coordination, detached thoughts would flash out in<br />

idle moments, illuminate a passing phase <strong>of</strong> reflection, <strong>and</strong> would the<br />

perish <strong>and</strong> be forgotten. <strong>The</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> an intuition can only be defined by<br />

its coordination with other notions <strong>of</strong> equal generality. Even the<br />

discordance <strong>of</strong> competing philosophic systems is a factor essential for<br />

progress. <strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> European thought, even to the present day, has<br />

been tainted by a fatal misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing. It may be termed <strong>The</strong><br />

Dogmatic Fallacy. <strong>The</strong> error consists in the persuasion that we are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> producing notions which are adequately defined in respect to<br />

the complexity <strong>of</strong> relationship required for their illustrations in the real<br />

world. Canst thou by searching describe the Universe? Except perhaps<br />

for the simpler notions <strong>of</strong> arithmetic, even our more familiar ideas,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!