Online Papers - Brian Weatherson

BIBLIOGRAPHY 735
—. 2005a. “The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.” Oxford Studies
in Epistemology 1:197–233.
—. 2005b. “Making Sense of Relative Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
105:321–339.
—. 2007. “Relativism and Disagreement.” Philosophical Studies 132:17–31.
Macfarlane, John. 2007. “Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism.”
In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism:
New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 240–250. Oxford University
Press.
MacFarlane, John. 2009. “Nonindexical Contextualism.” Synthese 166:231–250.
Machina, Kenton. 1976. “Truth, Belief and Vagueness.” Journal of Philosophical Logic
5:47–78, doi:10.1007/BF00263657.
Mackie, John. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. London: Penguin.
Maher, Patrick. 1993. Betting on Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. 1997. “Depragmatised Dutch Book Arguments.” Philosophy of Science 64:291–305.
Maitra, Ishani. 2007. “How and Why to Be a Moderate Contextualist.” In Gerhard
Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New
Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 111–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. 2010. “Assertion, Norms and Games.”
Mallon, Ron, Machery, Eduoard, Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen. 2009. “Against
Arguments from Reference.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79:332–
356.
Marshall, Dan and Parsons, Josh. 2001. “Langton and Lewis on ‘Intrinsic’.” Philosophy
and Phenomenological Research 63:347–351.
Martí, Genoveva. 2009. “Against Semantic Multi-Culturalism.” Analysis 69:42–48.
Matravers, Derek. 2003. “Fictional Assent and the (So-Called) “Puzzle of Imaginative
Resistance”.” In Kieran and Lopes (2003), 91–108.
Maudlin, Tim. 2007. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
May, Joshua, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Hull, Jay G., and Zimmerman, Aaron.
forthcoming. “Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions:
an Empirical Study.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology ,
doi:10.1007/s13164-009-0014-3.