11.12.2012 Views

Designing Ecological Habitats - Gaia Education

Designing Ecological Habitats - Gaia Education

Designing Ecological Habitats - Gaia Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 <strong>Designing</strong> ecological <strong>Habitats</strong><br />

One of the 13 large<br />

strategically placed<br />

ponds at Crystal<br />

Waters. Each pond<br />

is an element with<br />

many functions.<br />

Many people in the permaculture, ecovillage, urban ecology, new<br />

economics, peace and similar movements fail to grasp this need for simplicity.<br />

Many of the lifestyles in settlements which have otherwise excellent designs<br />

are much too affluent, in my opinion.<br />

The key is to focus on ‘need’. What is sufficient for comfort, health and<br />

hygiene, and a high quality of life? The difference between wants and<br />

needs can be enormous. Focusing on what is sufficient does not necessarily<br />

jeopardise the pursuit of social wealth, rich life experience, or personal and<br />

spiritual wealth. Indeed, excess accumulation of goods could be a hindrance<br />

to health and happiness.<br />

The Need for a New Economy<br />

A long-term sustainable economy must have a ‘zero-growth’ policy. Current<br />

levels of output are already unsustainable – compounding growth will<br />

only make matters worse. Consumer society has this manic obsession with<br />

economic growth, an obsession with obtaining and possessing more goods<br />

that we don’t really need.<br />

Consider the multiples of present levels of production and consumption<br />

that further growth implies. If the world averages only 3% per annum<br />

growth, then by 2060 total world output will be 8 times what it is today.<br />

But our recent history shows that 3% is not enough to make our economy<br />

‘healthy’.<br />

Do you realise that if we had 4% growth, if world population rises to<br />

the expected 9 billion, and if all those people were to come up to the ‘living<br />

standards’ of present-day Westerners, total world economic output would<br />

be 180 times what it is today! Yet the present level is unsustainable.<br />

How do you explain the fact that no conventional politician or<br />

economist seems to re cognize any problem with this enthusiastic<br />

commitment to increasing the GNP as the supreme and<br />

sacred goal?<br />

At present, the richest one-fifth of the world’s people is<br />

consuming four-fifths of the world’s resource production. As a<br />

result, billions of people are so seriously deprived of necessities<br />

that one child dies every three seconds; yet we insist on increasing<br />

our rich-world living standards, output and consumption on a<br />

linear trajectory that is rapidly heading for overshoot. Rather<br />

than increasing output in terms of quantity, we should aim at<br />

improving the quality of goods and services. Better tools, high<br />

level care, more efficient use of land – examples exist already.<br />

In the new economy, the cash sector will be rather small.<br />

Home and community based production will be emphasized.<br />

Swapping, gifts, barter, working bees, shramadamas1 , will increase.<br />

Indeed, there is no shortage of examples in the North<br />

and the South presently being practiced right now, at this very<br />

moment – so what are you waiting for?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!