13.05.2017 Views

BUS272 TB

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 Motivation in Action 175<br />

EXHIBIT 5-2 Management Reward Follies<br />

We hope for …<br />

Teamwork and collaboration<br />

Innovative thinking and risk-taking<br />

Development of people skills<br />

Employee involvement and empowerment<br />

High achievement<br />

Long-term growth; environmental responsibility<br />

Commitment to total quality<br />

Candour; surfacing bad news early<br />

But we reward …<br />

The best team members<br />

Proven methods and not making mistakes<br />

Technical achievements and accomplishments<br />

Tight control over operations and resources<br />

Another year’s effort<br />

Quarterly earnings<br />

Shipping on schedule, even with defects<br />

Reporting good news, whether it’s true or not; agreeing<br />

with the manager, whether or not (s)he’s right<br />

Sources: Constructed from S. Kerr, “On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B,” Academy of Management Executive 9, no. 1<br />

(1995), pp. 7 – 14 ; and “More on the Folly,” Academy of Management Executive 9, no. 1 (1995), pp. 15 – 16 . Copyright © Academy<br />

of Management, 1990.<br />

Beware the Signals That Are Sent by Rewards<br />

Perhaps more often than we would like, organizations<br />

engage in what has been called “the folly of rewarding A,<br />

while hoping for B” 63 ; in other words, managers may hope<br />

employees will engage in one type of behaviour, but they<br />

reward another. Expectancy theory suggests that individuals<br />

will generally perform in ways that raise the probability of<br />

receiving the rewards offered. Exhibit 5-2 provides examples<br />

of common management reward follies. By signalling what<br />

gets rewarded, organizations implicitly determine whether<br />

employees engage in organizational citizenship behaviour,<br />

as Focus on Research shows.<br />

Ever wonder why<br />

employees do<br />

some strange<br />

things?<br />

FOCUS ON RESEARCH<br />

The Reward for Helping Others at Work<br />

Is there a payoff to being a good citizen at work? We<br />

discussed in Chapter 1 how employers like employees to<br />

engage in organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). But do<br />

employees get rewarded for engaging in OCB?<br />

Research suggests that “it depends.” In some organizations,<br />

employees are evaluated more on how their work gets done. If they possess the requisite<br />

knowledge and skills, or if they demonstrate the right behaviours on the job (for example,<br />

always greeting customers with a smile), they are determined by management to be motivated,<br />

“good” performers. In these organizations, actions targeted toward task performance<br />

goals and actions targeted toward “citizenship” goals (for example, helping a co-worker<br />

in need) are evaluated positively, which then motivates employees to continue their OCB.<br />

However, in other organizations, employees are evaluated more on what gets done. Here,<br />

employees are determined to be “good” performers if they meet objective goals such as<br />

billing clients a certain number of hours or reaching a certain sales volume. When managers<br />

overlook employee OCB, frown on helpful behaviours, or create an overly competitive organizational<br />

culture, employees are not motivated to engage in helpful actions.<br />

There may be a trade-off between being a good performer and being a good citizen.<br />

In organizations that focus more on behaviours, following your motivation to be a good<br />

citizen can lead to positive outcomes for your career. However, in organizations that focus<br />

more on objective outcomes, you may need to consider the cost.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!