13.05.2017 Views

BUS272 TB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 Part 2 Striving for Performance<br />

EXHIBIT 5-4 The Job Characteristics Model<br />

Core job<br />

dimensions<br />

Critical<br />

psychological states<br />

Personal and<br />

work outcomes<br />

Skill variety<br />

Task identity<br />

Task significance<br />

Autonomy<br />

Experienced<br />

meaningfulness<br />

of the work<br />

Experienced<br />

responsibility<br />

for outcomes<br />

of the work<br />

High internal<br />

work motivation<br />

High-quality<br />

work performance<br />

High satisfaction<br />

with the work<br />

Feedback<br />

Knowledge of the<br />

actual results of<br />

the work activities<br />

Low absenteeism<br />

and turnover<br />

Employee growthneed<br />

strength<br />

Source: J. R. Hackman, G. R. Oldham, Work Redesign (excerpted from pages 78 – 80 ). Copyright © 1980 by Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.<br />

ISBN: 978-0201027792.<br />

service and hospitality workers rated them as being very low in meaningfulness. Fast<br />

food cooks were at the bottom of the list of meaningfulness. 79<br />

Jobs with high autonomy give incumbents a feeling of personal responsibility for<br />

the results; if a job provides feedback, employees will know how effectively they are<br />

performing. From a motivational standpoint, the JCM proposes that individuals obtain<br />

internal rewards when they learn (knowledge of results) that they personally have<br />

performed well (experienced responsibility) on a task they care about (experienced meaningfulness).<br />

80 The more these three psychological states are present, the greater will be<br />

employees’ motivation, performance, and satisfaction, and the lower their absenteeism and<br />

likelihood of leaving. As Exhibit 5-4 also shows, individuals with a high growth need are<br />

more likely to experience the critical psychological states when their jobs are enriched—<br />

and respond to them more positively—than are their counterparts with a low growth need.<br />

Autonomy does not mean the same for every person, as Focus on Research shows.<br />

FOCUS ON RESEARCH<br />

Autonomy and Productivity<br />

Can autonomy really make a difference? Research published<br />

in 2011 by professors Marylène Gagné and Devasheesh Bhave<br />

of Concordia’s John Molson School of Business found that every<br />

culture values autonomy, and that the perception of autonomy<br />

has a positive impact on employees. 81 “However, managers<br />

can’t simply export North American methods of granting autonomy anywhere and expect<br />

them to work. Even in Canada, approaches to giving workers more autonomy need to be<br />

constantly rethought as the country becomes more multicultural,” says Gagné.<br />

The researchers found that how autonomy is applied makes a difference in how it<br />

is perceived. In some cultures, too much freedom in the workplace can be viewed as<br />

management disorganization. However, if employees feel they have some control over<br />

their activities, they generally show more commitment and productivity, particularly when<br />

the work is complex or demands creativity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!