Essenes Gospel and its falsification Dez 18
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Creating fertility meant guiding people in accordance with<br />
the teaching of the <strong>Essenes</strong> to the right path, such that their<br />
behaviour would “bear fruit.” This also proves the scrolls<br />
were not deposited in haste by the <strong>Essenes</strong>, as it might have<br />
appeared. Rather, this was the work of the falsifiers of the<br />
New Testament themselves for the purpose of reinforcing the<br />
the Christian Doctrine <strong>and</strong> misleading future generations<br />
concerning the <strong>Essenes</strong>. This intention succeeded, in particular<br />
because in the remaining documents or in the modified<br />
writings, as in the NT, the essential roles of Mother Earth<br />
<strong>and</strong> physical health were removed.<br />
One could accuse Edmond Szekely of augmenting his books<br />
2, 3 <strong>and</strong> 4, which contain these texts, by borrowing these<br />
from the Qumran texts after the Qumran scrolls were discovered<br />
<strong>and</strong> published. But many terms <strong>and</strong> allegories related<br />
to Qumran <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Essenes</strong> speak for the authenticity of<br />
the Essene <strong>Gospel</strong>. Of course, we could not know about<br />
these contents before the discovery. Examples are:<br />
Children of Light, Sons of Darkness, human sons, Angels of<br />
Light, etc. These are found in other Christian documents.<br />
Nevertheless, they are related to the Essene Brotherhood in<br />
such precision <strong>and</strong> already contained in Szekely’s first book,<br />
published in 1926. Accordingly, Szekely could never have<br />
been able to invent these terms in connection with the <strong>Essenes</strong><br />
because no known historical documents made reference<br />
to these prior to the discovery of the Qumran scrolls.<br />
Szekely did not seem to grasp the scope of his discovery.<br />
After all, he made no effort to prove that the New Testament<br />
is a <strong>falsification</strong> of the <strong>Gospel</strong> of <strong>Essenes</strong>.<br />
122