Essenes Gospel and its falsification Dez 18

The similarity of the terms should obviously trigger a kind of
Déjà-vu among the readers, but it also later became clear to
me that, in order to provide a basis for the nonsensical doctrine
of grace: the supporters were soft-boiled by fantasy and
persuaded to cease using their minds. Virtue was simply to
believe in the unbelievable in order to prove one’s faith because
a doubter would not attain eternal life.
On the basis of the fantasy the Bible presents us, it was not
difficult for the falsifiers to invent a religion of grace that is
as nonsensical as the claims that Jesus had brought deceased
persons back to life, commanded a storm, and had walked
upon the water.
The adherents of the religion of grace were to believe in a
religion which is not at all a reliion, for it consisted solely in
believing that Jesus had died for our sins. They were to believe
they were invested with original sin and unable to observe
the Divine Commandments, and for that reason Jesus
had been crucified.
It gradually became clear to me that without exception the
entire NT was drafted or falsified according to the same
principle: a realization leadin to no other conclusion than
that the NT and important parts of the ÓT originated from
one and the same source, but also that all the texts in the NT
were written in the same period and that the authentic gospels
used for this had once been a unit.
Accordingly, there could never have been a canonization of
the Gospels in the year 324. Later, it became clear that Paul
was a fictitious figure introduced by the falsifiers of the true
gospel in order to consolidate this doctrine of grace. It was
18