Essenes Gospel and its falsification Dez 18
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which only belief in the sacrifice of Jesus was important for<br />
salvation, the necessity of keeping the body pure was not<br />
relevant.<br />
In approximately 150-200 AD, the time seemed to be right<br />
to focus upon the final text from the <strong>Gospel</strong> of <strong>Essenes</strong>. This<br />
posed a threat to the Doctrine of Grace. It was also the last<br />
sermon from the <strong>Gospel</strong> of <strong>Essenes</strong> borrowed by the falsifiers<br />
for the purpose of deceit. In this writing they dared to<br />
concentrate on the theme of necessity of purity of the<br />
body, the Earth, etc.<br />
However, the authors of the texts had to have been initiated<br />
into the strategy of falsifying the authentic writings. The<br />
same red thread is recognizable, as in the rest of the NT. It<br />
was to be assumed that the authors of the "Teachings of Silvanus"<br />
were not the same authors who had falsified the NT,<br />
although this document has been falsified according to the<br />
same intentions as the NT.<br />
A massive difference is observable: That is, the genius is<br />
missing. There are no ambiguous attacks against the Essene<br />
Prophet reflecting a macabre <strong>and</strong> cynical way of underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
– techniques evidently mastered by the authors of the NT<br />
alone.<br />
These "Teachings of Silvanus" are the final <strong>and</strong> simultaneously<br />
the most shocking plagiarism of the Essene <strong>Gospel</strong>.<br />
They offer us clues about the beginning <strong>and</strong> the end of the<br />
<strong>falsification</strong> of the <strong>Gospel</strong> of <strong>Essenes</strong>, if the expert opinions<br />
on the date of origin of the document „Silvanus " are reliable.<br />
It was clear from the beginning that the ”Teachings of Silvanus"<br />
would never be included in the writings of the NT. For<br />
the authors, in my view, revealed too many compromising<br />
135