Essenes Gospel and its falsification Dez 18

NT, though mostly in fantastic scenarios in which the Mother
Earth, even if appearing in a non-religious context, is never
mentioned. The doctrine of nutrition became the curse of
the fig tree, the healing through baptism became the beheading
of John, and bathing in the river became the sick people
at the pond Bethesda, just to cite a few examples. These scenarios
are not related, rather constitute three different stories.
Now imagine that someone would attempt to construct
a coherent story from these examples in the NT that would
make as much sense as the Gospel of Essenes, not only taking
into account the ambiguity of the falsifiers with regard to
the Essene Prophet, though also the different levels of understanding
of the Essene Gospel. And then imagine that these
examples were only three of several hundred that I discovered
altered in the New Testament according to the same
principle as the above-mentioned comparisons.
Anyone who has concerned himself with the falsifications
and read the trilogy would realize that an entire team had
been engaged in this falsification over a very long period of
time. The result is, in a negative sense, an ingenious and
unique work, namely the NT. This work was accomplished
under the guidance of a great mind. However, for verification
a literal translation of the NT or the OT would be necessary,
preferably an interlinear translation.
This work provides not only the ultimate proof of the existence
of the Gospel of Essenes, but also the proof of its authenticity.
If the Gospel of the Essenes is 2000 years old,
then my trilogy, "The Secret of the True Gospel," proves the
New Testament is a plagiarism of the Gospel of Essenes.
161