The Earliest Inhabitants: The Dynamics of the Jamaican Taino
by Lesley-Gail Atkinson
by Lesley-Gail Atkinson
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tion from plants, with <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> reconstructing <strong>the</strong> plant environment<br />
and determining subsistence and diet, evidence <strong>of</strong> trade and various ways in<br />
which societies utilize flora. Useful indicators for examination and analysis<br />
include macrobotanical remains, microbotanical remains, associated artefacts,<br />
art, and historical and ethnographic texts.<br />
Macrobotanical Remains<br />
<strong>The</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> macrobotanical remains includes <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> seeds and fruits,<br />
plant residues and charcoal (Renfrew and Bahn 2000, 244–46). In Jamaica,<br />
faunal analysis has significantly overshadowed floral analysis. <strong>The</strong> excavations<br />
at White Marl, St Ca<strong>the</strong>rine, and Chancery Hall, St Andrew, highlight<br />
<strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery and analysis <strong>of</strong> faunal remains. <strong>The</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong><br />
macrobotanical remains has been largely limited to <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> charcoal,<br />
primarily for dating purposes. For example, a charcoal sample from Chancery<br />
Hall dated <strong>the</strong> site AD 1260 ± 50 (Lechler 2000, 11). <strong>The</strong> excavations conducted<br />
by Bill Keegan at Paradise Park, Westmoreland, have encouraged <strong>the</strong><br />
recovery <strong>of</strong> macrobotanical remains from Taíno sites in an effort to reconstruct<br />
<strong>the</strong> natural environment.<br />
Microbotanical Remains<br />
<strong>The</strong> examination <strong>of</strong> microbotanical remains includes <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> pollen,<br />
phytoliths, fossil cuticles and plant DNA (Renfrew and Bahn 2000, 239–44).<br />
Unfortunately, to date <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence that analysis <strong>of</strong> microbotanical<br />
remains has been conducted in <strong>the</strong> island.<br />
Associated Artefacts<br />
Tools associated with certain activities can be useful indicators <strong>of</strong> plant use.<br />
According to Renfrew and Bahn, tools can prove or at least suggest that plants<br />
were processed at a site, and on rare occasions may indicate <strong>the</strong> species and <strong>the</strong><br />
use that was made <strong>of</strong> it (2000, 276). However, in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> supporting<br />
evidence, such as remains <strong>of</strong> domesticated plants, associated artefacts are inadequate<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> such features (ibid.). Some artefacts are multifunctional,<br />
and without supporting evidence it is difficult to determine what function or<br />
activity was performed at <strong>the</strong> specific site. In Jamaica, <strong>the</strong>re are many artefacts<br />
associated with plant use that have been found across <strong>the</strong> island, and <strong>the</strong>se<br />
objects can at least be used as possible evidence.<br />
98 T HE E ARLIEST I NHABITANTS