06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion<br />

Based on the foregoing reasons, we find the chancellor did not err in ruling that DeMarcus is<br />

entitled to two one-ninth shares <strong>of</strong> Janice's estate. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chancery Court <strong>of</strong> Pike County.<br />

The Judgment <strong>of</strong> the Chancery Court <strong>of</strong> Pike County is Affirmed.<br />

Notes and Questions<br />

1. In the majority jurisdictions, after a child is adopted, the court severs the relationship between that<br />

child and the child’s birth parents. Since a parent-child relationship no longer exists, the child does<br />

not have the right to inherit from the birth parents. See Matter <strong>of</strong> Estate <strong>of</strong> Jank, 521 N.W.2d 162 (Wis.<br />

App. 1994).<br />

2. Eventually, in stranger adoption cases, the identity <strong>of</strong> the birth parents was withheld from the<br />

adopted child. The purpose <strong>of</strong> that was to protect the privacy <strong>of</strong> the adopted parents and the birth<br />

parents. That also enables the child to be part <strong>of</strong> the new family unit. See Elizabeth J. Samuels, The<br />

Idea <strong>of</strong> Adoption: An Inquiry Into the History <strong>of</strong> Adult Adoptee Access to Birth Records, 53 Rutgers L. Rev.<br />

367 (Winter 2001).<br />

3. From a public policy perspective, what are the reasons to prevent the adopted child from<br />

inheriting from the biological parents? A child’s biological grandparents are not a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adoption process. Why does it make sense to prevent the child from inheriting from his or her<br />

biological grandparents?<br />

4. What would be the outcome <strong>of</strong> the Jenkins case in a UPC jurisdiction? Is the approach set forth in<br />

UPC § 2-113 better than the one utilized by the court in the Jenkins case?<br />

4.3.2 Equitable Adoption<br />

Right to inherit from the intended adoptive parents<br />

It is clear that a child who is legally adopted has a right to inherit from his or her adopted<br />

parents. In order for the adoption to be legal, the parties must comply with the mandates <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adoption statute. Nonetheless, courts have exercised their equitable powers to recognize informal<br />

arrangements that have the attributes <strong>of</strong> adoptions. These situations are referred to as virtual or<br />

equitable adoptions. An equitably adopted child acquires the right to inherit from the person who<br />

informally adopts him or her.<br />

In order to establish the existence <strong>of</strong> an equitable adoption, the child must prove the<br />

following elements: (1) an agreement to adopt between the birth parents and alleged adoptive<br />

parents; (2) performance by the birth parents <strong>of</strong> the child in giving custody; (3) performance by the<br />

child by living in the home <strong>of</strong> the alleged adoptive parents; (4) partial performance by the alleged<br />

adoptive parents in taking the child into their home and treating the child as their own child; and (5)<br />

intestacy <strong>of</strong> the alleged adoptive parents. Once a competent court decides that a child has been<br />

equitably adopted, that child has the right to inherit from the intended adoptive parents.<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!