06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

children for purposes <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> his or her estate. The next illustration will help the<br />

student visualize this principle.<br />

2.3.2 Illustration Two<br />

Diane died in 1978. She was survived by her husband Clyde and their eight children, Corey,<br />

Gigi, Christopher, Elizabeth, Stephanie, Marcia, Timothy, and Oscar. In 1986, Marcia died<br />

<strong>of</strong> a massive heart attack while riding a roller coaster. Marcia was survived by her husband,<br />

Jarvis, and her three daughters, Wanda, Ruth and Tracie. When Clyde died in 2000, he was<br />

survived by seven <strong>of</strong> his children, Marcia’s husband and Marcia’s three daughters.<br />

Clyde’s estate would be divided into eight portions because that is the number <strong>of</strong> his original<br />

children. Each <strong>of</strong> Clyde’s surviving children would receive a one-eighth share <strong>of</strong> his estate.<br />

The share <strong>of</strong> the estate that would have gone to Marcia, the child who predeceased Clyde,<br />

would be divided between her three daughters. As a result, Clyde’s estate would be<br />

distributed as follows: Corey (1/8), Gigi (1/8), Christopher (1/8), Elizabeth (1/8), Stephanie<br />

(1/8), Timothy (1/8), Oscar (1/8), Wanda (1/24), Ruth (1/24) and Tracie (1/24). Since most<br />

intestacy statutes exclude sons-in-law and daughters-in-law, Jarvis, Marcia’s husband, would<br />

not be entitled to receive any part <strong>of</strong> Clyde’s estate.<br />

In all jurisdictions, the intestacy system allows descendants <strong>of</strong> the decedent to inherit by<br />

representation. Consequently, Marcia’s daughters would have the right to receive her share <strong>of</strong><br />

Clyde’s estate. The definition <strong>of</strong> “taking by representation” varies from state to state. The shares that<br />

the descendants receive depend upon which one <strong>of</strong> the three commonly used methods <strong>of</strong><br />

representation that is applied. The main difference in each method is where the division into portion<br />

occurs. The decedent’s estate may be divided at the generational level immediately below the<br />

decedent or the generational level where a live descendant exists. This will be explained in more<br />

detail later in this chapter.<br />

2.3.3 Two Important Rules to Remember<br />

The three systems <strong>of</strong> representation will be discussed in the next section. In order to fully<br />

comprehend how the decedent’s estate will be divided, it is important to know two rules.<br />

Rule One: The descendants whose parents are living do not receive a share <strong>of</strong> the decedent’s estate.<br />

Example:<br />

Miguel, a widower, had three children, Juan, Carlos and Isabella. Unfortunately, Miguel lost his son<br />

Carlos in a car accident. Carlos was survived by two children, Manuel and Alejandro. Juan has a son<br />

named Mateo. Isabella had two children, Elena and Joaquin. Miguel died survived by Juan, Isabella,<br />

Manuel, Alejandro, Mateo, Elena and Joaquin.<br />

Explanation:<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!