06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Example:<br />

Helen, a 78 year old widow, had three children, Clarence, Cody and Cathy. Cathy took Helen to a<br />

lawyer, so that Helen could prepare her will. On the way to the lawyer’s <strong>of</strong>fice, the following<br />

conversation occurred:<br />

Helen: “I plan to leave my estate to you and your brothers equally.”<br />

Cathy: “You have to be careful because leaving Cody money will just hurt him.”<br />

Helen: “What are you talking about?”<br />

Cathy: “Cody has been taking drugs for years. The only reason he is sober sometimes is because he<br />

doesn’t have money to buy all <strong>of</strong> the drugs that he wants.”<br />

Helen: “Are you sure? This is my first time hearing that.”<br />

Cathy: “That’s because everyone is afraid <strong>of</strong> hurting your feelings.”<br />

Helen: “Thanks for letting me know.”<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the conversation, Helen left the majority <strong>of</strong> her estate to Clarence and Cathy. She<br />

placed a small amount in trust for Cody. Cathy intentionally lied about Cody having a drug problem.<br />

This is a classic example <strong>of</strong> fraud in the inducement.<br />

10.3.2 Fraud in the Execution<br />

Fraud in the execution occurs after the contents <strong>of</strong> the will have already been put in place<br />

and prior to the actual execution <strong>of</strong> the will. It encompasses cases where the testator is tricked into<br />

executing a document that is not his or her will or one that does not contain his or her expressed<br />

wishes.<br />

Example:<br />

Joseph, an 82 year old widower, had two children, Janice and Benjamin, and two grandchildren by<br />

his daughter Janice, Wayne and Garrett. Joseph had his attorney prepare a will in which he left 25%<br />

<strong>of</strong> his estate to Janice and 25% to Benjamin. The remaining 50% <strong>of</strong> the estate was placed in trust for<br />

Wayne and Garrett. Benjamin found a copy <strong>of</strong> the will on Joseph’s desk. Benjamin felt that, since<br />

Janice’s children were benefitting from the trust, she was entitled to a smaller percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

estate. Joseph had three <strong>of</strong> his friends come to his house to witness the signing <strong>of</strong> the will.<br />

Benjamin was present at the ceremony. He gave the will to Joseph for his signature. Joseph and the<br />

witnesses only looked at the signature page <strong>of</strong> the will. Joseph did not know that Benjamin had<br />

retyped the will, so that he received 50% <strong>of</strong> the estate, Janice received 25%, and the amount in the<br />

trust for Wayne and Garrett was reduced to 25%. This is a case <strong>of</strong> fraud in the execution because<br />

Joseph was tricked into signing a will with different terms than the ones he approved.<br />

10.4 Intentional Interference With An Inheritance Expectancy (IIE)<br />

No one has a right to inherit property. The right to dispose <strong>of</strong> property belongs to the<br />

testator. Thus, a person can legally disinherit any <strong>of</strong> his or her relatives. Nonetheless, when a person<br />

is prevented from inheriting property because <strong>of</strong> the actions <strong>of</strong> a third party, that person may have a<br />

464

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!