06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes, Problems, and Questions<br />

1. What would be the distribution <strong>of</strong> Donald’s estate under the English per stirpes system? Under<br />

the Modern per stripes system? Which outcome do you think Donald would have preferred?<br />

2. Let’s change the facts so that Donald was survived by his brothers, Stewart and Frederick. What<br />

would be the distribution <strong>of</strong> Donald’s estate under the English per stirpes system? Under the<br />

Modern per stirpes system?<br />

3. Let’s change the facts so that Donald was survived by only his brother, Stewart. What would be<br />

the distribution <strong>of</strong> Donald’s estate under the English per stirpes system? Under the Modern per<br />

stirpes system?<br />

4. Let’s change the facts so that all three <strong>of</strong> Donald’s brothers predeceased him, but Ted died leaving<br />

a son, Marvin. Thus, Donald would have been survived by his nieces, Susan and Mary, and his greatnephew,<br />

Marvin. What would be the distribution <strong>of</strong> Donald’s estate under the English per stirpes<br />

system? Under the Modern per stirpes system?<br />

5. These are the facts <strong>of</strong> the case: Donald had three brothers, Stewart, Frederick and Robert. Robert<br />

did not have any children. Stewart had three children, Susan, Anna and Mary. Frederick had two<br />

children, Ted and John. Susan, Anna, Mary, Ted and John did not have any children. Stewart,<br />

Frederick and Robert predeceased Donald. Anna and John also died prior to Donald. Let’s change<br />

the facts to include the following. Susan had a son, Glover. Mary had two children, Bonita and<br />

Henry. John has four children, Gail, Samuel, Pauline and Jason. Ted had one child, Kevin. Donald is<br />

only survived by John and Mary. What would be the distribution <strong>of</strong> Donald’s estate under the<br />

English per stirpes system? Under the Modern per stirpes system?<br />

6. In the Evans case, the court relied on the 1969 version <strong>of</strong> the Uniform Probate Code. According<br />

to the court, the 1969 version <strong>of</strong> the UPC was a form <strong>of</strong> the Modern per stirpes system. For reasons<br />

that will be discussed in the next section, the UPC changed its approached with the 1990<br />

amendments from per capita by representation to per capita at each generation. After you review the<br />

UPC section, come back to the Evans case and determine how Donald’s estate would have been<br />

distributed had the court applied the 1990 version <strong>of</strong> the UPC?<br />

2.4.4 Per capita at each generation (1990 Uniform Probate Code)<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> jurisdictions have adopted some form <strong>of</strong> the Uniform Probate Code (UPC).<br />

Thus, key provisions <strong>of</strong> that Code will be discussed throughout this text. If you are studying in a<br />

jurisdiction that has not adopted the UPC, it may still be helpful to use parts <strong>of</strong> the Code for<br />

comparative purposes.<br />

A shortcoming <strong>of</strong> the English and the Modern per stirpes approaches is that descendants<br />

who are equally related to the decedent may take unequal shares <strong>of</strong> the estates. For instance, some <strong>of</strong><br />

the decedent’s grandchildren may receive a greater share <strong>of</strong> the estate than others. Consider a brief<br />

example. A has three daughters, B, C and D. B has one child, E. C has two children F and G. D has<br />

three children H, I and J. A dies survived by D. The following distribution would occur under either<br />

per stirpes system: A’s estate will be divided into 3 shares. D will receive 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the estate. B’s child,<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!