06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

donor. 74 Posthumous reproduction has conditional acceptance in the Netherlands and Greece as<br />

long as written consent is acquired before the sperm donor dies. 75<br />

Problems<br />

1. Juan and Isabella were married for ten years. Juan was diagnosed with stomach cancer and had to<br />

undergo chemotherapy. Dr. Chin informed the couple that the chemotherapy might render Juan<br />

infertile. Juan and Isabella really wanted to have children. Therefore, Juan had his sperm frozen prior<br />

to submitting to treatment. As a part <strong>of</strong> that process, Juan signed a form stating that, in the event <strong>of</strong><br />

his death, he wanted Isabella to use his frozen sperm to conceive his child. In addition, Juan told his<br />

friends that Isabella was the love <strong>of</strong> his life, and so it was important for a little piece <strong>of</strong> them both to<br />

exist on the earth. Unfortunately, Juan passed away in January <strong>of</strong> 2011. In June <strong>of</strong> 2012, Isabella<br />

decided to have a child conceived using Juan’s sperm. Isabella was insecure about her looks. She told<br />

her best friend, Debbie, “There is no way I’m passing on this face.” Debbie agreed to donate some<br />

<strong>of</strong> her eggs to Isabella, so Isabella could have the beautiful child that she wanted. After the hospital<br />

released Juan’s sperm to Isabella, Isabella used the sperm to fertilize Debbie’s egg. Isabella did not<br />

want to mess up her figure, so she hired a surrogate, Hillary, to carry the child for her. On February<br />

18, 2013, Hillary gave birth to a little boy named Juan, Jr. Will Juan, Jr. be legally recognized as<br />

Juan’s child? What ethical issues may arise out <strong>of</strong> these facts?<br />

2. Patrick signed a document giving his wife, Bonnie, permission to conceive a child using his sperm<br />

in the event that he died. Patrick wanted to make sure that Bonnie had something by which to<br />

remember him. Patrick was in a car accident. As a result, Patrick suffered brain damage and is in a<br />

vegetative state. Patrick is breathing on his own, but has very little brain activity. Doctors informed<br />

Bonnie that Patrick would never recover from his condition. However, doctors confirmed that<br />

Patrick could remain in a vegetative state for years. Bonnie presented the written form Patrick signed<br />

and requested that the doctors extract Patrick’s sperm, so that she could use it to conceive his child.<br />

Bonnie does not want to wait until Patrick dies to get the sperm because her biological clock is<br />

ticking. The head <strong>of</strong> the clinic has consulted you for advice. In light <strong>of</strong> the above-listed statutes, how<br />

would you respond?<br />

3. Mitch told his wife Lisa that, if they did not conceive a child prior to his death, she could have his<br />

sperm extracted and use it to conceive a child posthumously. Without Mitch’s knowledge, Lisa<br />

recorded the conversation. A few months later, Lisa and Mitch had a fight over money. Mitch<br />

refused to destroy the pre-nuptial agreement that limited Lisa’s interest in his assets to 5% upon his<br />

death or if they got a divorce. According to the pre-nuptial agreement, any children <strong>of</strong> the marriage<br />

would receive 25% <strong>of</strong> Mitch’s assets. On June 10, 2014, Mitch filed for a divorce. Two days later,<br />

Mitch was killed in a car accident. Lisa played the tape recorded conversation for the doctor and<br />

demanded the removal <strong>of</strong> Mitch’s sperm. The doctor complied with Lisa’s request and she used<br />

74<br />

Assisted Human Reproduction (Section 8 Consent) Regulations SOR/2007-137,<br />

75<br />

Usha Ahluwalia and Maia Arora, Posthumous Reproduction and Its Legal Perspective, 2 International Journal <strong>of</strong> Fertility and<br />

Fetal Medicine, 9, 12 (January 2011) (citing Art. 7 Embryos Bill); Mavr<strong>of</strong>orou, A., Koumantakis, E., Mavrophoros, D.,<br />

and Michalodimitrakis, E., Medically assisted human reproduction: the Greek view, 26 Med. <strong>Law</strong> 339, 341 (2007)(citing Medically<br />

Assisted Human Reproduction Act 3089/02 which states “Artificial insemination carried out after the death <strong>of</strong> the<br />

husband or the woman's partner, is allowed only by judicial permission and only under the following circumstances: a.<br />

The husband or the permanent partner <strong>of</strong> the woman suffers from a disease, which endangers his life or fertility b. The<br />

husband or the woman's partner has already given his consent before a notary for posthumous artificial insemination.”).<br />

274

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!