06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

executed. On November 30, 2014, Devon executed a codicil to his will leaving his farm to his son<br />

James.<br />

Explanation:<br />

Since the will was not validly executed, it could not be republished by the codicil, so Devon died<br />

intestate. If the will was validly executed but invalidated because Devon was unduly influenced, it<br />

could be republished by codicil.<br />

13.5 Acts <strong>of</strong> Independent Significance<br />

§ 4-512. Events <strong>of</strong> Independent Significance.<br />

A will may dispose <strong>of</strong> property by reference to acts and events that have significance apart from<br />

their effect upon the dispositions made by the will, whether they occur before or after the execution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the will or before or after the testator’s death. The execution or revocation <strong>of</strong> another individual’s<br />

will is such an event.<br />

Courts may rely on the doctrine <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> independent significance to consider outside<br />

evidence to determine the disposition <strong>of</strong> property under a will. This extrinsic evidence is used to<br />

show that the changes to the testator’s will were the result <strong>of</strong> nontestamentary acts. The testator’s<br />

beneficiary or property designations must be identified by reference to acts or events that have a<br />

lifetime motive and significance apart from their effect on the will.<br />

Example:<br />

T executed a will stating, “I leave the house that I am living in at my death to my friend, Maxine.” At<br />

the time the will is executed, T is living in a house worth $200,000. Thus, the value <strong>of</strong> her bequest to<br />

Maxine is $200,000. If T wants to improve the value <strong>of</strong> her gift to Maxine, she has to modify her<br />

will. However, T does not want to go to the trouble <strong>of</strong> amending her will, so she purchases a new<br />

house that is worth $400,000.<br />

Explanation:<br />

Because Maxine is to take the house that T is living in at the time <strong>of</strong> her death T’s actions increase<br />

Maxine’s bequest by $200,000. The court will not permit T to get around the formalities <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Wills</strong><br />

Act. Because <strong>of</strong> T’s testamentary motive the court will not recognize the new bequest.<br />

Example:<br />

T executed a will stating, “I leave the house that I am living in at my death to my friend, Maxine.” At<br />

the time the will is executed, T is living in a house worth $200,000. Thus, the value <strong>of</strong> her bequest to<br />

Maxine is $200,000. T’s daughter and her grandchildren move in with T, so T needs a bigger house.<br />

T purchases a new house that is worth $400,000.<br />

578

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!