06.09.2021 Views

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

Law of Wills, 2016A

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Nine: Testamentary Capacity (Mental Competency and Insane<br />

Delusion)<br />

9.1. Introduction<br />

A probate attorney has two key roles: (1) to execute a will that carries out the testator’s intent<br />

and (2) to create a will that is challenge-pro<strong>of</strong>. Persons seeking to contest the probate <strong>of</strong> a will<br />

usually take two avenues—they challenge the testator’s capacity to execute the will and/or they<br />

challenge the validity <strong>of</strong> the execution process. This chapter and Chapter 10 examine the ways in<br />

which the testator’s ability to execute a legally enforceable will may be called into question. The cases<br />

in this chapter deal with the manner in which some defect in the testator may prevent him or her<br />

from being capable <strong>of</strong> executing a valid will. The cases in chapter 10 focus upon the way that the<br />

actions <strong>of</strong> other people may interfere with the testator’s ability to execute a valid will. Chapter 11<br />

and Chapter 12 discuss will contests based upon the testator’s failure to follow the execution<br />

process.<br />

According to the law in all states, in order to execute a will, a person must be at least 18<br />

years old and <strong>of</strong> sound mind. The statutes do not include a definition <strong>of</strong> what it means for a person<br />

to be “<strong>of</strong> sound mind.” When evaluating the soundness <strong>of</strong> a person’s mind, lay persons think in<br />

psychological terms. For example, if a person has been diagnosed with some type <strong>of</strong> mental illness,<br />

the average person would say that person is not “<strong>of</strong> sound mind.” However, a mentally ill person<br />

may be legally competent to execute a will. 84 The level <strong>of</strong> mental competence necessary to execute a<br />

will is very low compared to what is required to undertake other legal actions like executing a<br />

contract, obtaining a marriage license or executing a deed to transfer title to a piece <strong>of</strong> property. 85<br />

The attorney who prepares the will and assists in the execution process has a duty to<br />

determine whether or not his or her client is legally “<strong>of</strong> sound mind.” Most attorneys have not been<br />

trained to make psychological evaluations. Thus, in order to determine if a client has testamentary<br />

capacity, an attorney must rely on the guidelines provided by the courts. In order to be deemed to<br />

have testamentary capacity, at the time that the will is executed, the testator must know the<br />

following: (1) the nature and extent <strong>of</strong> his or her property; (2) the persons who are the natural<br />

objects <strong>of</strong> his or her body; (3) the disposition he or she is making; and (4) the manner in which these<br />

facts related so far as to form an orderly plan for the disposition <strong>of</strong> his or her property. The attorney<br />

should take steps during the initial client interview to determine if his or her client can satisfy the<br />

testamentary capacity test.<br />

Once an attorney concludes that his or her client can satisfy the mental capacity test, that<br />

may not be the end <strong>of</strong> the story. The client may do or say something to lead the attorney to believe<br />

that the client is suffering from a misconception that could hamper his or her ability to create a will.<br />

The insane delusion test is a two part test. The court first has to decide whether or not the testator<br />

was suffering from an insane delusion when the will was executed. Then, the court has to determine<br />

whether the dispositions the person made were a result <strong>of</strong> that delusion. 86 A delusion is insane even<br />

84<br />

Matter <strong>of</strong> Gentry’s Estate, 573 P.2d 322 (Or. App. 1978); Briggs v. Kreutztrager, 433 S.W.3d 355 (Ky. App. 2014).<br />

85<br />

Denson v. Moses, 2 So. 3d 847 (Ala. App. 2008).<br />

86<br />

Breeden v. Stone, 992 P.2d 1167, 1171 (Colo. 2000).<br />

409

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!