06.09.2021 Views

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1. Matrix Arithmetic 89<br />

Example 2.64: Non Square Matrices<br />

Let<br />

Show that A T A = I but AA T ≠ I.<br />

⎡<br />

A = ⎣<br />

1 0<br />

0 1<br />

0 0<br />

⎤<br />

⎦,<br />

Solution. Consider the product A T A given by<br />

[ 1 0 0<br />

0 1 0<br />

] ⎡ ⎣<br />

1 0<br />

0 1<br />

0 0<br />

⎤<br />

⎦ =<br />

[ 1 0<br />

0 1<br />

Therefore, A T A = I 2 ,whereI 2 is the 2 × 2 identity matrix. However, the product AA T is<br />

⎡ ⎤<br />

⎡ ⎤<br />

1 0 [ ] 1 0 0<br />

⎣ 0 1 ⎦ 1 0 0<br />

= ⎣ 0 1 0 ⎦<br />

0 1 0<br />

0 0<br />

0 0 0<br />

Hence AA T is not the 3 × 3 identity matrix. This shows that for Theorem 2.63, it is essential that both<br />

matrices be square and of the same size.<br />

♠<br />

Is it possible to have matrices A and B such that AB = I, while BA = 0? This question is left to the<br />

reader to answer, and you should take a moment to consider the answer.<br />

We conclude this section with an important theorem.<br />

Theorem 2.65: The Reduced Row-Echelon Form of an Invertible Matrix<br />

For any matrix A the follow<strong>in</strong>g conditions are equivalent:<br />

• A is <strong>in</strong>vertible<br />

• The reduced row-echelon form of A is an identity matrix<br />

]<br />

Proof. In order to prove this, we show that for any given matrix A, each condition implies the other. We<br />

first show that if A is <strong>in</strong>vertible, then its reduced row-echelon form is an identity matrix, then we show that<br />

if the reduced row-echelon form of A is an identity matrix, then A is <strong>in</strong>vertible.<br />

If A is <strong>in</strong>vertible, there is some matrix B such that AB = I. By Lemma 2.59, we get that the reduced rowechelon<br />

form of A does not have a row of zeros. Then by Theorem 2.61, it follows that A and the reduced<br />

row-echelon form of A are square matrices. F<strong>in</strong>ally, by Proposition 2.62, this reduced row-echelon form of<br />

A must be an identity matrix. This proves the first implication.<br />

Now suppose the reduced row-echelon form of A is an identity matrix I. ThenI = EA for some product<br />

E of elementary matrices. By Theorem 2.63, we can conclude that A is <strong>in</strong>vertible.<br />

♠<br />

Theorem 2.65 corresponds to Algorithm 2.37, which claims that A −1 is found by row reduc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

augmented matrix [A|I] to the form [ I|A −1] . This will be a matrix product E [A|I] where E is a product of<br />

elementary matrices. By the rules of matrix multiplication, we have that E [A|I]=[EA|EI]=[EA|E].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!