06.09.2021 Views

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

A First Course in Linear Algebra, 2017a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 Matrices<br />

Theorem 2.34: Uniqueness of Inverse<br />

Suppose A is an n × n matrix such that an <strong>in</strong>verse A −1 exists. Then there is only one such <strong>in</strong>verse<br />

matrix. That is, given any matrix B such that AB = BA = I, B = A −1 .<br />

Proof. In this proof, it is assumed that I is the n × n identity matrix. Let A,B be n × n matrices such that<br />

A −1 exists and AB = BA = I. We want to show that A −1 = B. Now us<strong>in</strong>g properties we have seen, we get:<br />

A −1 = A −1 I = A −1 (AB)= ( A −1 A ) B = IB = B<br />

Hence, A −1 = B which tells us that the <strong>in</strong>verse is unique.<br />

♠<br />

The next example demonstrates how to check the <strong>in</strong>verse of a matrix.<br />

Example 2.35: Verify<strong>in</strong>g the Inverse of a Matrix<br />

[ ] [ ]<br />

1 1<br />

2 −1<br />

Let A = . Show<br />

is the <strong>in</strong>verse of A.<br />

1 2<br />

−1 1<br />

Solution. To check this, multiply<br />

[<br />

1 1<br />

1 2<br />

][<br />

2 −1<br />

−1 1<br />

]<br />

=<br />

[<br />

1 0<br />

0 1<br />

]<br />

= I<br />

and [<br />

2 −1<br />

−1 1<br />

][ 1 1<br />

1 2<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g that this matrix is <strong>in</strong>deed the <strong>in</strong>verse of A.<br />

]<br />

=<br />

[ 1 0<br />

0 1<br />

]<br />

= I<br />

♠<br />

Unlike ord<strong>in</strong>ary multiplication of numbers, it can happen that A ≠ 0butA mayfailtohavean<strong>in</strong>verse.<br />

This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g example.<br />

Example 2.36: A Nonzero Matrix With No Inverse<br />

[ ]<br />

1 1<br />

Let A = . Show that A does not have an <strong>in</strong>verse.<br />

1 1<br />

Solution. One might th<strong>in</strong>k A would have an <strong>in</strong>verse because it does not equal zero. However, note that<br />

[ ][ ] [ ]<br />

1 1 −1 0<br />

=<br />

1 1 1 0<br />

If A −1 existed, we would have the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

[ ]<br />

0<br />

0<br />

])<br />

= A −1 ([<br />

0<br />

0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!