02.01.2013 Views

LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE Vol. 54 NR. 2 SERIA HORTICULTURĂ

LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE Vol. 54 NR. 2 SERIA HORTICULTURĂ

LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE Vol. 54 NR. 2 SERIA HORTICULTURĂ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ludovic (78,6 cm), being distinct positively significant compared to the control<br />

cultivar Boambe de Cotnari (67,0 cm). At the other cultivars (Alex, Anda and<br />

Margo) the length of the annual increases was near as value to the control<br />

cultivars (tab. 1).<br />

Table 1<br />

Data concerning the average length of the shoots<br />

registered between 2008-2010<br />

The average length of the shoots<br />

Crt.<br />

nr.<br />

Cultivar<br />

The average<br />

length of the<br />

Calculated compared to the control<br />

cultivar<br />

shoots(cm) % Difference Signification<br />

1. Cociu 79,4 118,5 12,4 ++<br />

2. Ludovic 78,6 117,3 11,6 ++<br />

3. Margo 67,3 100,4 0,3<br />

4.<br />

Boambe de Cotnari<br />

(Control)<br />

67,0 100 0 -<br />

5. Anda 64,0 95,5 -3,0<br />

6. Alex 62,1 92,6 -4,9<br />

LSD 5% = 7,1 cm LSD 1% = 10,3 cm LSD 0,1% = 15,5 cm<br />

Concerning to the trunk’s section area, all the cultivars registered a<br />

continuous increase (the annual average rate being between 16-38 cm 2 ). By<br />

interpreting statistically the data, Cociu (221 cm 2 ) and Anda (213 cm 2 ) was the<br />

most vigorous compared to the control cultivar Boambe de Cotnari, registering<br />

distinct positively significant values (tab. 2).<br />

Table 2<br />

Data concerning the trunk’s section area registered between 2008-2010<br />

The trunk’s section area<br />

Crt.<br />

nr.<br />

Cultivar<br />

The trunk’s<br />

section area<br />

(cm 2 )<br />

Calculated compared to the<br />

witness<br />

% Difference Signification<br />

1. Cociu 221 130,0 51 ++<br />

2. Anda 213 125,3 43 ++<br />

3. Margo 185 108,8 15<br />

4. Alex 182 107,1 12<br />

5. Ludovic 179 105,3 9<br />

6.<br />

Boambe de Cotnari<br />

(Control)<br />

170 100 0 -<br />

LSD 5% = 28,6 cm 2 LSD 1% = 41,6 cm 2 LSD 0,1% = 62,4 cm 2<br />

Because the absence of the water determined disorders of production regularity<br />

and of crop’s size, the production from the three years had to suffer. The drought from<br />

2007 affected the fruit’s production and the size of the 2008’s harvest.<br />

In 2009, the fruit’s production was significantly reduced due to the drought<br />

during March-September, the water deficit being one of 166,6 mm/m 2 .<br />

Yield of 2010 was partially affected by the heavy rainfall from June (22-29.06),<br />

when during some days there was registered an excess of 78,7 mm/m 2 (the fruits being<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!