02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION TACTICS, TWO-VERSUS-ONE 203<br />

Large vertical separations between fighters can reduce defensive capability,<br />

since the lower aircraft may not be able to climb up quickly to the<br />

level of the wingman to render assistance without losing so much airspeed<br />

that it becomes ineffective. Higher performance fighters can, therefore,<br />

afford larger altitude splits.<br />

Aircraft structural design enters the picture because of its effect on<br />

cockpit field of view. A modern low-wing fighter, for instance, often has a<br />

more restricted field of view behind <strong>and</strong> down because of the obstruction of<br />

the wing. If one fighter is stepped-up in this case, its wing might obscure a<br />

large portion of the wingman's rear hemisphere. When necessary this<br />

problem may be alleviated by rolling the aircraft periodically to check the<br />

hidden region, but generally it is better to avoid the problem altogether by<br />

readjusting relative aircraft altitudes.<br />

In general, within the limits described, larger splits, both horizontally<br />

<strong>and</strong> vertically, provide better offensive potential. This is partially because<br />

greater separation affords more maneuvering flexibility <strong>and</strong> partially because<br />

enemy fighters are less likely to see both aircraft simultaneously.<br />

However, this improved offensive potential may be gained at the cost of<br />

reduced defensive capability, because of visibility <strong>and</strong> performance factors.<br />

Usually the prudent section will opt for splits nearer the minimum<br />

limits in high-threat areas, or when the immediate chances of engaging<br />

offensively are slim. Wider splits are more appropriate in low-threat conditions<br />

<strong>and</strong> in the final stages of an offensive attack.<br />

Engaged <strong>Maneuvering</strong><br />

It is in the engaged phase that double attack departs most dramatically<br />

from fighting wing doctrine. For example, when the enemy is spotted by<br />

the wingman, no time is wasted getting the leader's eyes on the target. If<br />

the wingman is in a favorable position <strong>and</strong> he considers attack to be<br />

advisable, he assumes the lead <strong>and</strong> attacks. The new wingman positions to<br />

cover his teammate, usually high above the fight. Since the wingman is<br />

relieved of his close-formation requirement, he can devote full attention to<br />

the more important task of providing effective visual coverage. His maneuvering<br />

requirements are also reduced, so the wingman can use this<br />

opportunity to increase his energy level, making him more effective in<br />

case he later becomes engaged.<br />

It is wonderful how cheered a pilot becomes after he shoots down his first<br />

machine; his moral[e] increases by at least 100 per cent.<br />

Captain Ira "Taffy" Jones, RAF<br />

40 Victories, WW-I<br />

Once the section has split, there is a subtle shift from the leader/<br />

wingman relationship between pilots to an engaged fighter-free fighter<br />

relationship. The pilot of the engaged fighter is the one more closely<br />

involved with the adversary. In essence, he is the section leader at that<br />

moment. The first duty of the engaged fighter in offensive double attack is<br />

to press the attack. The result of this attempt will be either destruction of<br />

the target or loss of the offensive. At the first sign that the offensive is being<br />

lost (i.e., impending overshoot, energy depletion, etc.), the engaged-fighter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!