02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

268 DIVISION TACTICS<br />

design began to stress aircraft speed <strong>and</strong> heavy armament <strong>and</strong> armor <strong>and</strong> to<br />

neglect maneuverability <strong>and</strong> cockpit field of view.<br />

With no war, we forgot about building airplanes we could see out of.<br />

Colonel Erich "Bubi" Hartmann, GAP<br />

The fighter formation almost universally accepted during this period<br />

was the three-plane vee, or "vie," with the aircraft positioned almost<br />

wingtip-to-wingtip for concentration of firepower. This formation (see<br />

Figure 7-1) allowed the leader to maneuver fairly well <strong>and</strong> to fly through<br />

clouds with little chance of losing his wingmen. He was able to hit quickly<br />

to limit exposure to bomber defensive fire, <strong>and</strong> all fighters could fire at<br />

once at the same target for maximum concentration of destructive power.<br />

The vie had some drawbacks, however: only one bomber could be<br />

targeted at a time, <strong>and</strong> the close formation allowed defensive fire to be<br />

concentrated on all fighters simultaneously. The leader was also the only<br />

one likely to have a good shot, since the wingmen had to be more concerned<br />

with not running into somebody than with aiming their guns.<br />

Firing range for the wingmen was also increased, since they had to cease<br />

fire when the leader reached minimum range <strong>and</strong> broke off his attack.<br />

Several of these vies could operate together <strong>and</strong> coordinate their attacks<br />

to bring additional targets under fire <strong>and</strong> to spread the defensive fire. These<br />

additional vies also offered each other some visual mutual support, since<br />

the defensive effectiveness of individual divisions was very limited because<br />

of formation requirements. One favorite arrangement of vies on<br />

patrol was for several vies to form a larger vie spaced at wider intervals<br />

than the individual elements. This was a fairly effective formation for<br />

visual cross-cover, but it was difficult to maneuver, so the elements often<br />

dropped into trail on each other when substantial maneuvering was required.<br />

This arrangement still offered good defensive coverage for all<br />

elements except "Tail-end Charlie."<br />

This, then, was the thinking of most of the air powers of the world in the<br />

1920s <strong>and</strong> 1930s. Some were able to test this doctrine during conflicts in<br />

the late 1930s, notably the Spanish Civil War <strong>and</strong> the Sino-Japanese War.<br />

These conflicts revealed that the relative superiority of bombers over<br />

fighters of the period was greatly exaggerated. Whenever bombers were<br />

met by determined fighter resistance, the bombers nearly always suffered<br />

Figure 7-1. The Vic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!