02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 SECTION TACTICS, TWOVERSUS-ONE<br />

carries a higher risk of the fighters becoming separated simply through loss<br />

of sight.<br />

Although some double attack principles were used occasionally during<br />

World War I, the doctrine is generally considered to have been developed<br />

during the Spanish Civil War in the late 1930s by Werner Moelders of the<br />

German Condor Legion. The installation of radios in most German<br />

fighters, the increased difficulty of defending against high-speed attacks<br />

from the rear, <strong>and</strong> the necessity of engaging more maneuverable opponents<br />

led to use of the loose pair, which the Germans called the rotte. This<br />

doctrine provided the Luftwaffe with a considerable advantage over their<br />

foes early in World War II, but eventually it was accepted <strong>and</strong> employed to<br />

some extent by most of the Allied air forces, <strong>and</strong> it survives today as<br />

probably the most common air-to-air doctrine in use.<br />

Loose Deuce<br />

Why let rank lead, when ability can do it better?<br />

Comm<strong>and</strong>er R<strong>and</strong>y "Duke" Cunningham, USN<br />

"Loose deuce" is the popular name of a tactical doctrine developed by<br />

the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam conflict. Rather than being an entirely<br />

new doctrine, loose deuce is actually a rather minor variation of double<br />

attack, but its use today is general enough that a discussion of loose deuce<br />

is warranted here.<br />

Similarities with Double Attack<br />

Like double attack, loose deuce is based on a loose, coordinated pair of<br />

fighters in mutual support. Pre-engaged philosophy <strong>and</strong> cruise formations<br />

are essentially identical in these two doctrines. <strong>Combat</strong> spread is probably<br />

the most common cruising formation, for all the reasons described earlier.<br />

A pre-engagement leader is designated, but once they are engaged the<br />

pilots revert to engaged fighter—free fighter roles. Variations on the bracket<br />

attack (Figure 5-3) are also the bread <strong>and</strong> butter of loose deuce. Defensive<br />

loose deuce maneuvering is essentially identical to that of double attack,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the techniques illustrated in Figures 5-4 through 5-8 are all relevant.<br />

Engaged <strong>Maneuvering</strong><br />

In offensive engaged maneuvering philosophy, however, the two doctrines<br />

diverge. The primary responsibility of the loose deuce free-fighter pilot is<br />

to position for his own attack on the bogey, rather than simply covering the<br />

engaged fighter. While the offensive double attack free-fighter pilot is<br />

primarily defensive, <strong>and</strong> awaits the engaged pilot's call before attacking,<br />

the loose deuce free-fighter pilot is not under any such restrictions. Each<br />

pilot is responsible for visually clearing his wingman <strong>and</strong> himself. The<br />

engaged pilot devotes most of his attention to offense, however, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

free pilot's duties are split about fifty-fifty between offense <strong>and</strong> defense.<br />

The pilot of the engaged fighter in double attack doctrine fights the<br />

bogey one-versus-one until he destroys the target or he faces imminent<br />

loss of the offensive. Ideally, there should never be two fighters offensively

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!