02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 FIGHTER WEAPONS<br />

some firing ranges. The "lethal bullet density" was increased by a method<br />

known as "harmonization," which generally involved using one of two<br />

techniques.<br />

"Point harmonization" aligned the outboard guns slightly toward the<br />

aircraft centerline so that the bullets met at a point that was assumed to be<br />

the optimum combat firing range (normally 700 to 800 ft). This method<br />

resulted in maximum lethal density near this particular range, but led to<br />

wide dispersion at much longer ranges. Point harmonization was often<br />

preferred by the pilots who had the best marksmanship <strong>and</strong> were confident<br />

they could place this maximum density point on target.<br />

For most pilots, another method, known as "pattern harmonization,"<br />

yielded better results. This involved adjusting each gun individually<br />

slightly up, down, left, or right to produce a fairly uniform bullet pattern of<br />

a certain diameter at the harmonization range. Although maximum lethal<br />

density was not achieved in this manner, the average fighter pilot had a<br />

better chance of getting hits. The advantages of this method were much<br />

like those of a shotgun over those of a rifle. More lethal projectiles also<br />

favored this technique, as maximum density usually was not necessary.<br />

Mounting guns such that their line of fire does not extend through the<br />

aircraft center of gravity (CG) introduces other problems. Particularly<br />

when wing-mounted guns are located large distances from the CG, failure<br />

of a gun to fire on one side can cause the aircraft to yaw significantly,<br />

greatly complicating aim. Aircraft designed with asymmetrical gun<br />

mounts often require some automatic aerodynamic control coordination,<br />

such as rudder deflection, to compensate for these effects.<br />

The recoil action of heavy, rapid-fire guns can be considerable <strong>and</strong> can<br />

often cause significant speed loss for the firing aircraft. At slow speeds,<br />

especially under asymmetrical firing conditions, this recoil can cause a<br />

stall <strong>and</strong> subsequent loss of control.<br />

With the advent of jet aircraft, one further complication has arisen to<br />

the mounting of guns. The gun gases produced must be exhausted in such a<br />

manner that they are not ingested by the engine, as this can cause compressor<br />

stalls <strong>and</strong> flameouts.<br />

The next significant technical breakthrough in air-to-air guns appeared<br />

following World War II. This was a new cannon, modeled from an experimental<br />

German gun <strong>and</strong> built around a rotating cylinder similar to a<br />

"revolver" h<strong>and</strong>gun. This design, known as the M39 in the United States,<br />

resulted in a great increase in rate of fire.<br />

Even greater performance was obtained in the late 1950s with the<br />

introduction of the "Gatling-gun" cannon. Rather than a revolving cylinder,<br />

this weapon employed multiple rotating barrels. Designated the M61<br />

in the United States, this gun could develop a tremendous rate of fire with<br />

less barrel overheating <strong>and</strong> erosion. Additionally, this gun was usually<br />

electrically, hydraulically, or pneumatically propelled; because it was not<br />

dependent on the residual energy of the expended round, problems associated<br />

with duds were eliminated.<br />

During the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s there was a definite trend away from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!