05.01.2013 Views

Caring for Pollinators - Bundesamt für Naturschutz

Caring for Pollinators - Bundesamt für Naturschutz

Caring for Pollinators - Bundesamt für Naturschutz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ssymank, Hamm, Vischer-Leopold & Wittmann Introduction<br />

1 Introduction<br />

by A. Ssymank, A. Hamm, M. Vischer-Leopold & D. Wittmann<br />

Pollination is a key function in all terrestrial ecosystems, interlinking the fate of plants and<br />

animals. Pollinating animals are themselves a major part of the biodiversity worldwide, they<br />

are safeguarding plant biodiversity and indirectly all the animals depending on fruits or<br />

leaves of animal pollinated plants <strong>for</strong> their food. A world without pollination is beyond imagination<br />

and would have lost all its richness and most of its vegetation. Pollination services<br />

cannot just be replaced by humans, are extremely valuable and are a precondition <strong>for</strong> or<br />

affecting an estimated 35% of the world’s crop production, increasing outputs of 87 of the<br />

leading food crops (FAO 2008). The total economic value of pollination services worldwide is<br />

estimated to €153 billion, with vegetables, fruits (see fruit buffet, p. 121 as the leading crop<br />

categories in value of insect pollination (Gallai et al. 2008).<br />

There is direct and indirect evidence of pollinators decline worldwide in different regions,<br />

which is likely to impact production of fruits and vegetables and to accelerate the loss of species<br />

diversity. This is particularly important in highly modified agricultural landscapes, where<br />

pollinators are most needed <strong>for</strong> food production and crop security.<br />

Animal pollination is wide-spread among plant species (estimated 85 % of all plants) with<br />

probably close to 300,000 flower visiting animal species worldwide (Nabham & Buchmann<br />

1997). Pollen limited fecundity in wild plants is frequent and pollen transfer by animal is vital<br />

<strong>for</strong> the biodiversity of all terrestrial ecosystems. For example many of the beautiful tropical<br />

cacti (<strong>for</strong> example Pachycereus pringlei) are bat-pollinated, many ornamental plants with<br />

large red or orange flowers are bird pollinated. However the large majority of plants are insect-pollinated:<br />

wasps, beetles and butterflies visit flowers. Especially the bees and the true<br />

flies are the main pollinator groups worldwide (see fact sheets of pollinator groups, p. 148).<br />

They transfer the pollen between different flowers while using plant resources and ensure or<br />

enlarge the reproduction success of cultivated and wild plants.<br />

Bees were called “testimonies of the golden days” by Virgil, the Roman writer Publius Vergilius,<br />

70-19 BC. In his book “Georgica” (about Agriculture), Virgil displayed no knowledge on<br />

where nectar comes from. He thought that honey ‘drops from the sky as tears of Narcissus’.<br />

He also had no notion of pollination by wind or by animals. Only as late as the 18th century<br />

did such facts emerge, recorded by a school teacher and naturalist living in the small German<br />

town of Jena. Christian Konrad Sprengel observed that in the fields and woods around<br />

his home several insects, especially bees, transport pollen grains and deposit them on the<br />

stigma of a flower. In a series of careful experiments he discovered that those pollen grains<br />

are essential <strong>for</strong> the production of fruits and seeds. He published his results in the book “The<br />

Discovered Secret of Nature in the Morphology and Fertilisation of Flowers”, in 1793. This<br />

should have been a breakthrough <strong>for</strong> science. Instead, Wolfgang von Goethe, celebrated<br />

writer of “Metamorphis of Plants” and well known nature scientist condemned Sprengel’s<br />

findings. The non-scientific argument he gave was that such a wonderful creation as a flower<br />

could not possibly depend <strong>for</strong> its reproduction on such an ugly creature as an insect.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!