Microbiology Research - Academic Journals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5084 Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. REFERENCES Anaya AL (1999). Allelopathy as tool in the management of biotic resources in agro-ecosystems. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci., 18: 697–739. Araújo ASF, Leite LFC, Santos VB, Carneiro RFV (2009). Soil Microbial Activity in Conventional and Organic Agricultural Systems. Sustainability, 1: 268–276. Arden-Clarke C, Hodges RD (1988). The environmental effects of conventional and organic/biological farming systems. II. Soil ecology, soil fertility and nutrient cycles. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 5: 223-287. Bending GD, Putland C, Rayns F (2000). Changes in microbial community metabolism and labile organic matter fractions as early indicators of the impact of management on soil biological quality. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 31: 78–84. Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibul AN (2005). The effects organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol., 42: 261–269. Birkhofer K, Bezemer Martijn T, Bloem Jaap, Bonkowski M, Christensen Søren, Dubois D (2008). Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological controand productivity. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 40(9): 2297–2308. Burger M, Jackson LE (2003). Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 35: 29–36. Carey PL, Benge JR, Haynes RJ (2009). Comparison of soil quality and nutrient budgets between organic and conventional kiwifruit orchards. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 132(1-2): 7–15. Clark MS, Horwath WR, Shennan C, Scow KM, Lantni WT, Ferris H (1999). Nitrogen, weeds and water as yield-limiting factors in conventional, low-input, and organic tomato systems. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 73: 257-270. Dahllof I (2002). Molecular community analysis of microbial diversity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 13: 213–217. Das BB, Dkhar MS (2011). Rhizosphere Microbial Populations and Physico Chemical Properties as Affected by Organic and Inorganic Farming Practices. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 10(2): 140–150. de Oliveira Freitas N, Yano-Melo AM, da Silva FSB, de Melo NF, Maia LC (2011). soil biochemistry and microbial activity in vineyards under conventional and organic management at Northeast Brazil. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), 68(2): 223–229. Dick RP (1992). A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 40: 25–36. Dohrmann AB, Tebbe CC (2004). Microbial community analysis by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP). In: Kowalchuk GA, de Bruijn FJ, Head IM, Akkermans ADL, van Elsas JD (eds): Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 809–838. Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994). Defining soil quality, in: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment, vol. 35. Soil Science Society of America Special Publications, Madison, pp. 3–21. Findlay RH, King GM, Watling L (1989). Efficacy of phospholipid analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55: 2888–2893. Fisher MM, Triplett EW (1999). Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 4630–4636. Foster SSD, Bridge LR, Geake AK, Lowrence AR, Parker JM (1986). The groundwater nitrate problem: a summary of research on the impact of agricultural land-use practices on groundwater quality between 1976 and 1985. Hydrogeol. Rep. Br. Geol. Surv. No. 86/2. Br. Geol. Surv., Oxfordshire, England. Gajda A, Martyniuk S (2005). Microbial Biomass C and N and Activity of Enzymes in Soil under Winter Wheat Grown in Different Crop Management Systems. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 14(2): 159–163. Gajda A, Martyniuk S, Stachyra A, Wroblewska B, Zieba S (2000). Relations between microbiological and biochemical properties of soil under different agrotechnical conditions and its productivity. Pol. J. Soil. Sci., 33: 55. Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2004). Microbial diversity in soil: selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 42: 243–270. Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty JN, Mark Osborn A, Ball, AS (2003). Soil Type Is the Primary Determinant of the Composition of the Total and Active Bacterial Communities in Arable Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 3: 1800–1809. Gunapala N, Scow KM (1998). Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30: 805–816. Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, Walker P (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ. Health Perspect., 110: 445–456. Insam H (2001). Developments in soil microbiology since the mid 1960s. Geoderma, 100: 389–402. Jordahl JL, Karlen DL (1993). Comparison of alternative farming systems. III. Soil aggregate stability. Am. J. Altern. Agric., 8: 27–33. Kennedy AC, Smith KL (1995). Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. In: Collins, H.P., Robertson, G.P., Klug, M.J. (Eds.), the Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 75–86. Lawanprasert A, Kunket K, Arayarangsarit L, Prasertsak A (2007). Comparison between Conventional and Organic Paddy Fields in Irrigated Rice Ecosystem. 4th INWEPF Steering Meeting and Symposium, 2: 1–9. Lee DH, Zo YG, Kim SJ (1996). Nonradioactive method to study genetic profiles of natural bacterial communities by PCR-single-strandconformation polymorphism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62: 3112– 3120. Leifeld J, Reiser R, Oberholzer HR (2009). Consequences of Conventional versus Organic farming on Soil Carbon: Results from a 27-Year Field Exper. Agric. J., 101(5): 1204–1218. Li ZY, Hu Y, Liu Y, Huang Y, He LM, Miao XL (2007). 16S rDNA clone library-based bacterial phylogenetic diversity associated with three South China Sea sponges. World J. Microbiol. B iotechnol., 23: 1265–1272. Liu B, Tu C, Hu SJ, Gumpertz M, Ristaino JB (2007). Effect of organic, sustainable, and conventional management strategies in grower fields on soil physical, chemical, and biological factors and the incidence of Southern blight. Appl. Soil Ecol., doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.06.007 Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ (1997). Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63: 4516–4522. Mäder P, Fleissbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Sci., 296: 1694–1697. Marinari S, Mancinelli R, Campiglia E, Grego S (2006). Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy. Ecol. Indic., 6: 701-711. Marshall VG (2000). Impacts of forest harvesting on biological processes in northern forest soils. Forest. Ecol. Manag., 133: 43–60. Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L, Hallet S, Chaussod R, Germon JC, Soulas G, Catroux G (2001). DNA extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67: 2354–2359. Martyniuk S, Gajda A, Kuś J (2001). Microbiological and biochemical properties of soil under cereals grown in the ecological, conventional and integrated systems. Acta. Agrophysica, 52: 185. Mazzola M (2002). Mechanisms of natural soil suppressiveness to soilborne diseases. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek: Intern. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol., 81: 557–564. Melero S, Porras JCR, Herencia JF, Madejon E (2006). Chemical and biochemical properties in a silty loam soil under conventional and organic management. Soil. Till. Res., 90: 162–170. Mills DK, Entry JA, Gillevet PM (2007). Assessing microbial community diversity using amplicon length heterogeneity polymerase chain reaction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71: 572–578. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993). Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59: 695–700. Myśków W, Stachyra A, Zięba S, Masiak D (1996). Microbial activity as an indicator of soil fertility and productivity (in Polish). Rocz. Glebozn., 47: 89. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003). Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 54: 655–670. Okur N, Altindişli A, Çengel M, Göçmez S, Kayikcioğlu HH (2009). Microbial biomass and enzyme activity in vineyard soils under organic and conventional farming systems. Turk. J. Agric. For., 33: 413–423. Orr CH, James A, Leifert C, Cooper JM, Cummings SP (2011). Diversity and Activity of Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Total Bacteria in Organic and Conventionally Managed Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 3: 911–919. Ottesen AR (2008). Microbial Ecology and Horticultural Sustainability of Organically and Conventionally Managed Apples. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9017 Poudel DD, Horwarth WR, Lanini WT, Temple SR, van Bruggen, AHC (2002). Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low input and conventional farming systems in northern California. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 90: 125–137. Ramaswami PP, Son TTN (1996). Quality compost from agricultural wastes. Paper presented at the national workshop on “Organic farming for sustainable agriculture”. Water and land management training and Research Institute Hyderabad, India. Ranjard L, Poly F, Nazaret S (2000). Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. Res. Microbiol., 151: 167–177. Reganold JP, Andrews PK, Reeve JR, Carpenter-Boggs L, Schadt CW, Richard Alldredge J, Ross CF, Davies NM, Zhou JZ (2010). Fruit and soil quality of organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems. PLoS One, 5(9): e12346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012346. Reganold JP, Glover JD, Andrews PK, Hinman HR (2001). Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature, 410: 926– 930. Reganold JP, Palmer AS, Lockhart JC, Macgregor AN (1993). Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Sci., 260: 344–349. Rigby D, Cáceres D (2001). Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric. Syst., 68: 21–40. Sanz JL, Köchling T (2007). Molecular biology techniques used in wastewater treatment: an overview. Process Biochem., 42: 119–133. Shalon D, Smith SJ, Brown PO (1996). A DNA microarray system for analyzing complex DNA samples using two-color fluorescent probe hybridization. Genome Res., 6: 639–645. Shu W, Ye J, Pablo GP, Dan-Feng H (2011). Abundance and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in rhizosphere and bulk paddy soil under different organic management. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 5(31): 5560- 5568. Wang et al. 5085 Stroo HF, Alexander M (1986). Role of soil organic matter in the effect of acid rain on nitrogen mineralisation. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 50: 1219–1223. Sugiyama A, Vivanco JM, Jayanty SS, Manter DK (2010). Pyrosequencing assessment of soil microbial communities in organic and conventional potato farms. Plant. Dis., 94:1329–1335. Trewavas A (2004). A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of notill agriculture. Crop Prot., 23: 757–781. Tu C, Louws FJ, Creamer Nancy G, Paul Mueller J, Brownie C, Fager K, Bell M, Hu SJ (2006). Responses of soil microbial biomass and N availability to transition strategies from conventional to organic farming systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 113(1-4): 206–215. van Bruggen AHC, Semenov AM (2000). In search of biological indicators for plant health and disease suppression. Appl. Soil. Ecol., 15: 13–24. van Diepeningen AD, de Vos OJ, Korthals GW, van Bruggen AHC (2006). Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and biological parameters in agricultural soils. Appl. Soil. Ecol., 31:120–135. Wander MM, Hedrick DS, Kaufman D, Traina SJ, Stinner BR, Kehrmeyer SR, White DC (1995). The functional significance of the microbial biomass in organic and conventionally managed soils. Plant. Soil., (170): 87–97. Wang S, Gonzalez Perez P, Ye J, Huang DF (2012). Abundance and Diversity of Nitrogen-fixing Bacteria in Rhizosphere and Bulk Paddy Soil under Different Duration Organic Management. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 28: 493-503. Whipps JM (1997). Developments in the biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens. In: Callow, J.A. (Ed.), Adv. Bot. Res., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 26: 1–134. Willer H, Yussefi M (2004). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements: Bonn, Germany, p. 167.
Page 1 and 2: African Journal of Microbiology Res
Page 3 and 4: Editors Prof. Dr. Stefan Schmidt Ap
Page 5 and 6: Electronic submission of manuscript
Page 7 and 8: Fees and Charges: Authors are requi
Page 9 and 10: nces Table of Contents: Volume 6 Nu
Page 11 and 12: Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Overview of the Soil prope
Page 17 and 18: exactly. MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN ORGAN
Page 19: Table 3. Advantages and disadvantag
Page 23 and 24: Enzyme assay Triplicate samples of
Page 25 and 26: Figure 2. Effect of a) incubation t
Page 29 and 30: Table 2. Plasmid profile. Emerenini
Page 33 and 34: Table 1. Properties and identity of
Page 35 and 36: more understandable by the fact tha
Page 37 and 38: fertilizers considered the most imp
Page 39 and 40: Table 3. Effect of NPK levels and s
Page 41 and 42: Table 4. Effect of NPK levels and s
Page 43 and 44: Table 5. Effect of NPK levels and f
Page 45 and 46: with mineral NPK on wheat plant. Eg
Page 47 and 48: to synthetic antibiotics. In spite
Page 49 and 50: Among these, the K. pneumonia and V
Page 51 and 52: Figure 5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa An
Page 53 and 54: pathogens of their environment (She
Page 55 and 56: cultivable indigenous fishes of Ind
Page 59 and 60: Table 1. Oxidative stress parameter
Page 61 and 62: of tularemia. Ann N Y Acad. Sci., 1
Page 63 and 64: al., 1998; Heubuelt 1929) have alre
Page 65 and 66: Table 2. Influence of organic compo
Page 67 and 68: NO2 NO2 Zare et al. 5131 Figure 4.
Page 69 and 70: Sundermeyer-Klinger H, Meyer W, War
Page 71 and 72:
Table 1. Composition of Mueller-Hin
Page 73 and 74:
dose level, and is effective antibi
Page 75 and 76:
wearing a mask is useful during the
Page 77 and 78:
Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A H1N1
Page 79 and 80:
that it produces lactic acid, bacte
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 2. DMRT Graph, effect of var
Page 83 and 84:
African Journal of Microbiology Res
Page 85 and 86:
Bacillus colony Fig 1. Colony morph
Page 87 and 88:
thuringiensis isolate S1 (Figure 6)
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 1. The Kinetic of P. aerugin
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3. DNA-dosimeter determined
Page 95 and 96:
Relative Fluorescence Unit Figure 4
Page 97 and 98:
Conclusion The public health risk i
Page 99 and 100:
general are members of the normal i
Page 101 and 102:
Table 2. Distribution of Nosocomial
Page 103 and 104:
and also to assess the influence of
Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. List of decamers used in R
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 2. RAPD profile of Fusarium
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Table 1. Biosurfactant production p
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 3. The correlation of reduct
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
To estimate the water content, stra
Page 119 and 120:
Kraiem et al. 5183 Table 2. Effect
Page 121 and 122:
log CFU/g log CFU/g log CFU/g 8.5 7
Page 123 and 124:
delays to cooling and wrapping on s
Page 125 and 126:
pilus (tcp) that is a subtle of pol
Page 127 and 128:
protein. DISCUSSION 70 kda 60 kda 5
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Percentage repellency (%) Percentag
Page 133 and 134:
Fumigant toxicity of essential oils
Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Primers used for PCR and s
Page 137 and 138:
Table 3. Amino acid substitutions i
Page 139 and 140:
composition in qnrB alleles. Althou
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 1. Overview the Yongxing isl
Page 145 and 146:
standard, XSLJ1, XSLJ2, XSLJ5, XSLJ
Page 147 and 148:
Table 1. primer information: sequen
Page 149 and 150:
conventional method. The reasons fo
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 1. Comparison of amplificati
Page 155 and 156:
Table 3. Fruiting-body formation an
Page 157 and 158:
Yokoyama E, Yamagishi K, Hara A (20
Page 159 and 160:
Table 1. Primer oligonucleotide seq
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 2. Nucleotide and putative a
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 6. Ghrelin expression induce
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Table 1. The SNPs related to the pr
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 2. The phylogenetic trees of
Page 171 and 172:
a c Rex DNA Tang et al. 5235 Figure
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Table 1. Gender and division wise d
Page 177 and 178:
62% were genotype D, A (14%), C (6%
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Swimming time (s) 1000 800 600 400
Page 183 and 184:
Hepatic glycogen (mg/g) Hemoglobin
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Table 2. Sporulation index. Sign In
Page 189 and 190:
Table 4. Conidial size of different
Page 191 and 192:
Table 6. Sporulation of Alternaria
Page 193 and 194:
Table 7. Reaction of different geno
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Table 2. Susceptibility of the clin
Page 199 and 200:
Table 4. Aminoglycoside resistance
Page 201 and 202:
Young, and the Councils on Clinical
Page 203 and 204:
oleaginous microorganisms have been
Page 205 and 206:
Table 2. Actual and predicted value
Page 207 and 208:
Table 4. Analysis of variance (ANOV
Page 209 and 210:
Huang et al. 5273 Figure 3. Respons
Page 211 and 212:
the Central Universities (Grant No.
Page 213 and 214:
Figure 1. Mechanism of enzymatic co
Page 215 and 216:
Enzymatic activity (U/mL) Enzymatic
Page 217 and 218:
prunin so far. By using the HPLC me
Page 219 and 220:
Figure 7. Enzymatic conversion of n
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
vaccine, HBs-Ab is negative in all
Page 225 and 226:
Conferences and Advert August 2012
show all

Microbiology Research - Academic Journals

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?