15.01.2013 Views

Microbiology Research - Academic Journals

Microbiology Research - Academic Journals

Microbiology Research - Academic Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

al., 1998; Heubuelt 1929) have already been described.<br />

This article describes the cultural and the biochemical<br />

characteristics of a new strain of bacteria and the result<br />

of a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S<br />

rRNA gene sequences.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Isolation procedures<br />

Isolation<br />

The strain was isolated from soil in a potato field in Hamadan (Lat.<br />

34˚47′46″ N, Long. 48˚30′57″ E), Iran (March 2004, GenBank<br />

accession No. AY569007). Five hundred mg soil was shrilled in a<br />

300 ml flask according to Drews (1968). The cells were grown at<br />

28°C for 2 weeks. Then the cell suspension was inoculated into<br />

agar media (basic mineral medium and 18 g agar-agar added to 1<br />

liter of water) (Merck, Germany). Various types of colonies were<br />

isolated and grown separately on agar plates with nitrite and<br />

mineral salt (Merck, Germany) by multiple subcultures.<br />

Culture conditions<br />

The culture media was prepared as described by Drews (1968)<br />

and Bock et al. (1990). The basic mineral was supplemented with<br />

400 mg sodium acetate, 1500 mg yeast extract (Difco, USA) and<br />

1500 mg peptone (Merck, Germany) in 1 L of water at pH 7.6 (for<br />

aerobic-growth), and nitrate instead of peptone, as an electron<br />

acceptor for anaerobic conditions. Master plates (Stock cultures)<br />

were prepared under mixotrophic conditions.<br />

Batch cultivation<br />

Batch cultures were grown in 50 ml liquid media. Based mineral<br />

medium (Merck, Germany) supplemented with sodium acetate,<br />

yeast extract, and peptone for routine and mixotrophic cultivation<br />

under aerobic conditions was used (Bock et al., 1990; Drews,<br />

1968). For heterotrophic growth (Bock et al., 1990), the medium<br />

was modified as follows: 1000 mg nitrate (Merck, Germany) as an<br />

electron acceptor was added to 1 L of medium under anaerobic<br />

conditions. All experiments were done at pH 6.7, 7.6, and 8.3 and<br />

repeated at least 3 times.<br />

Analytical procedures<br />

Protein purification<br />

The protein was purified from enzyme extracts and measured<br />

exactly as previously described by Bradford (1976), Spector (1978),<br />

Davie (1982) and Laemmli (1970). Membranes and nitrite<br />

oxidoreductase were isolated and purified according to<br />

Sundermeyer-Klinger et al. (1984).<br />

Gel electrophoresis<br />

SDS-PAGE (Merck, Germany) was performed as described by<br />

Milde and Bock (1984) and Sundermeyer-Klinger et al. (1984). The<br />

cytochrome spectra of cell-free extract of the new strain (104) was<br />

determined as previously explained by Sorokin et al. (1998). A<br />

Zare et al. 5127<br />

diode-array spectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard, USA) was used<br />

for the investigation. Proteins were identified from polyacrylamide<br />

gels by the method of Francis and Becker (1984).<br />

DNA and 16S rRNA analysis<br />

For isolation of DNA, 2 g of wet weight cells were suspended in 5<br />

ml TE buffer (50 mmol Tris, 20 mmol EDTA, pH 8.0) (Merck,<br />

Germany). Cell lysates were prepared as described by Kraft and<br />

Bock (1984). Total DNA was isolated and purified according to<br />

Marmur (1961). The G+C content was calculated from the<br />

denaturizing rate according to De Ley (1970).<br />

PCR amplification for the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene and<br />

sequencing were done as described by Brinkhoff and Muyzer<br />

(1997) and Muyzer et al. (1995). Sequences were compared using<br />

ARB software (Ludwig et al., 2004). The 16S rRNA gene<br />

sequences of the isolates were automatically aligned to sequences<br />

stored in the ARB database.<br />

Electron microscopy<br />

Cells cultured under mixotrophic conditions were concentrated 100fold,<br />

and methods for fixation, embedding, and ultra-thin sections<br />

were those described by Bock and Heinrich (1969). Sections were<br />

stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy<br />

Sciences, USA). Electron micrographs were taken with a<br />

transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss EM-900; Zeiss,<br />

Germany) at 80 kV accelerating voltage. Negatives were scanned<br />

at 1200 dpi resolution, by CanoScan 8800F (Canon, Japan), and<br />

pictures were processed using Adobe ® Photoshop ® software (CS4<br />

Extended, Middle East Version 11.0).<br />

Phylogenic analysis<br />

In order to establish the precise taxonomic position of unknown<br />

bacterium, the entire 16S rRNA sequences of the strain (104) was<br />

determined.<br />

RESULTS<br />

G+C analysis<br />

The G+C content of the new strain 104 DNA was 59%.<br />

This value is different from Nitrobacter winogradskyi (61.7<br />

mol%), Nitrobacter hamburgensis (61.2-61.6 mol%),<br />

Nitrobacter vulgaris (58.9-59.9 mol%) and Nitrobacter<br />

alkalicus (61.5-62.4 mol%) (Bock et al., 1990; Sorokin et<br />

al., 1998).<br />

The derived 16S rRNA consisted of 1421 nucleotides.<br />

The determined sequences were compared with those of<br />

other 16S rRNA sequences available in the GenBank.<br />

Nitrobacteria hamadaniensis (strain 104) with 95.9%<br />

genetic homology with Caulobacter, and 96.3% with<br />

Brevundimonas (Table 1). It has 86-87.4% genetic<br />

homology to the genus Nitrobacter, which are classified<br />

as one of the main classes of Caulobacteriaceae. A<br />

phylogenic tree, depicting the relationship of unknown<br />

bacterium with Caulobacteriaceae and close relatives,are<br />

shown in Figure 1, and the sequence similarities are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!