Microbiology Research - Academic Journals
Microbiology Research - Academic Journals
Microbiology Research - Academic Journals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
al., 1998; Heubuelt 1929) have already been described.<br />
This article describes the cultural and the biochemical<br />
characteristics of a new strain of bacteria and the result<br />
of a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S<br />
rRNA gene sequences.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
Isolation procedures<br />
Isolation<br />
The strain was isolated from soil in a potato field in Hamadan (Lat.<br />
34˚47′46″ N, Long. 48˚30′57″ E), Iran (March 2004, GenBank<br />
accession No. AY569007). Five hundred mg soil was shrilled in a<br />
300 ml flask according to Drews (1968). The cells were grown at<br />
28°C for 2 weeks. Then the cell suspension was inoculated into<br />
agar media (basic mineral medium and 18 g agar-agar added to 1<br />
liter of water) (Merck, Germany). Various types of colonies were<br />
isolated and grown separately on agar plates with nitrite and<br />
mineral salt (Merck, Germany) by multiple subcultures.<br />
Culture conditions<br />
The culture media was prepared as described by Drews (1968)<br />
and Bock et al. (1990). The basic mineral was supplemented with<br />
400 mg sodium acetate, 1500 mg yeast extract (Difco, USA) and<br />
1500 mg peptone (Merck, Germany) in 1 L of water at pH 7.6 (for<br />
aerobic-growth), and nitrate instead of peptone, as an electron<br />
acceptor for anaerobic conditions. Master plates (Stock cultures)<br />
were prepared under mixotrophic conditions.<br />
Batch cultivation<br />
Batch cultures were grown in 50 ml liquid media. Based mineral<br />
medium (Merck, Germany) supplemented with sodium acetate,<br />
yeast extract, and peptone for routine and mixotrophic cultivation<br />
under aerobic conditions was used (Bock et al., 1990; Drews,<br />
1968). For heterotrophic growth (Bock et al., 1990), the medium<br />
was modified as follows: 1000 mg nitrate (Merck, Germany) as an<br />
electron acceptor was added to 1 L of medium under anaerobic<br />
conditions. All experiments were done at pH 6.7, 7.6, and 8.3 and<br />
repeated at least 3 times.<br />
Analytical procedures<br />
Protein purification<br />
The protein was purified from enzyme extracts and measured<br />
exactly as previously described by Bradford (1976), Spector (1978),<br />
Davie (1982) and Laemmli (1970). Membranes and nitrite<br />
oxidoreductase were isolated and purified according to<br />
Sundermeyer-Klinger et al. (1984).<br />
Gel electrophoresis<br />
SDS-PAGE (Merck, Germany) was performed as described by<br />
Milde and Bock (1984) and Sundermeyer-Klinger et al. (1984). The<br />
cytochrome spectra of cell-free extract of the new strain (104) was<br />
determined as previously explained by Sorokin et al. (1998). A<br />
Zare et al. 5127<br />
diode-array spectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard, USA) was used<br />
for the investigation. Proteins were identified from polyacrylamide<br />
gels by the method of Francis and Becker (1984).<br />
DNA and 16S rRNA analysis<br />
For isolation of DNA, 2 g of wet weight cells were suspended in 5<br />
ml TE buffer (50 mmol Tris, 20 mmol EDTA, pH 8.0) (Merck,<br />
Germany). Cell lysates were prepared as described by Kraft and<br />
Bock (1984). Total DNA was isolated and purified according to<br />
Marmur (1961). The G+C content was calculated from the<br />
denaturizing rate according to De Ley (1970).<br />
PCR amplification for the nearly complete 16S rRNA gene and<br />
sequencing were done as described by Brinkhoff and Muyzer<br />
(1997) and Muyzer et al. (1995). Sequences were compared using<br />
ARB software (Ludwig et al., 2004). The 16S rRNA gene<br />
sequences of the isolates were automatically aligned to sequences<br />
stored in the ARB database.<br />
Electron microscopy<br />
Cells cultured under mixotrophic conditions were concentrated 100fold,<br />
and methods for fixation, embedding, and ultra-thin sections<br />
were those described by Bock and Heinrich (1969). Sections were<br />
stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy<br />
Sciences, USA). Electron micrographs were taken with a<br />
transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss EM-900; Zeiss,<br />
Germany) at 80 kV accelerating voltage. Negatives were scanned<br />
at 1200 dpi resolution, by CanoScan 8800F (Canon, Japan), and<br />
pictures were processed using Adobe ® Photoshop ® software (CS4<br />
Extended, Middle East Version 11.0).<br />
Phylogenic analysis<br />
In order to establish the precise taxonomic position of unknown<br />
bacterium, the entire 16S rRNA sequences of the strain (104) was<br />
determined.<br />
RESULTS<br />
G+C analysis<br />
The G+C content of the new strain 104 DNA was 59%.<br />
This value is different from Nitrobacter winogradskyi (61.7<br />
mol%), Nitrobacter hamburgensis (61.2-61.6 mol%),<br />
Nitrobacter vulgaris (58.9-59.9 mol%) and Nitrobacter<br />
alkalicus (61.5-62.4 mol%) (Bock et al., 1990; Sorokin et<br />
al., 1998).<br />
The derived 16S rRNA consisted of 1421 nucleotides.<br />
The determined sequences were compared with those of<br />
other 16S rRNA sequences available in the GenBank.<br />
Nitrobacteria hamadaniensis (strain 104) with 95.9%<br />
genetic homology with Caulobacter, and 96.3% with<br />
Brevundimonas (Table 1). It has 86-87.4% genetic<br />
homology to the genus Nitrobacter, which are classified<br />
as one of the main classes of Caulobacteriaceae. A<br />
phylogenic tree, depicting the relationship of unknown<br />
bacterium with Caulobacteriaceae and close relatives,are<br />
shown in Figure 1, and the sequence similarities are