18.01.2013 Views

Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA

Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA

Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary<br />

The present thesis provides an introduction to the topic <strong>of</strong> sanitation and indicates its close<br />

links to slum settlements, malnutrition and public health. Furthermore, the issue <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />

sanitation as an alternative to conventional and inadequate sanitation and its economic impact<br />

are considered. <strong>Sustainable</strong> sanitation, the underlying paradigm covered in this thesis,<br />

considers human excreta as valuable resource rather than waste, promoting the closure <strong>of</strong><br />

nutrient cycles by reusing the excreta as fertiliser. At the same time sustainable sanitation<br />

provides effective alternatives for reducing sanitation induced diseases arising from<br />

inadequate sanitation practices. In a second step, taking into consideration the above<br />

mentioned findings, large scale scenarios for the logistics <strong>of</strong> sustainable sanitation in urban<br />

areas - an issue which has been identified as crucial for its successful implementation have<br />

been designed. The geographical focus <strong>of</strong> the thesis is Sub-Sahara Africa, particularly<br />

Kampala, the capital <strong>of</strong> Uganda. However, being based on field work conducted in this<br />

region, the findings <strong>of</strong> this thesis can well be adapted to other developing countries in the<br />

world.<br />

The main findings <strong>of</strong> the thesis are summarised below: There are 2.6 billion people in the<br />

world that lack adequate access to improved sanitation (<strong>SuSanA</strong>, 2008, p. 1). The effects <strong>of</strong><br />

this situation can among others be understood by taking a look at the number <strong>of</strong> people that<br />

are affected by diarrhoea, being considered as main burden <strong>of</strong> disease <strong>of</strong> poor water,<br />

sanitation and hygiene (cf. Prüss et al., 2002, cited in Hutton et al., 2007, p. 469). But not<br />

enough, also the issue <strong>of</strong> undernourishment and with it the suffering <strong>of</strong> close to one billion<br />

people is indirectly affected by sanitation due to the negative impact diarrhoea has on the<br />

nutrient uptake efficiency. Another aspect potentially affecting the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> people<br />

emerges when considering that common sanitation practices prevent nutrients present in<br />

human excreta from being reused for food production. Finally, this threatening image is<br />

intensified by considering trends <strong>of</strong> urbanisation and the dynamic emergence <strong>of</strong> slums that are<br />

per definition, places <strong>of</strong> inadequate water supply, sanitation and hygiene (UNHABITAT,<br />

2003a, p. 12).<br />

Considering the diversity and impact <strong>of</strong> the above mentioned numbers and links, inadequate<br />

sanitation can be seen as a trigger for a variety <strong>of</strong> problems, which can for instance be<br />

expressed as number <strong>of</strong> people dying from infectious diarrhoea, decreased productivity<br />

because <strong>of</strong> people being debilitated or forced to stay at home or environmental degradation.<br />

Another way <strong>of</strong> presenting those effects is by introducing an economic dimension by<br />

attributing monetary values to the individual effects, where applicable. This practice has two<br />

main advantages. Firstly, it allows calculating the average economic burden a person suffers<br />

from e.g. in terms <strong>of</strong> productive days lost. Secondly, it contrasts the burden that could be<br />

averted by investments in infrastructure improvements (e.g. sustainable sanitation facilities)<br />

with the costs <strong>of</strong> those investments by calculating benefit-cost ratios (BCR) (cf. chapter 3.2<br />

and Hutton et al., p. 494). The results <strong>of</strong> the calculations in this thesis show that the annual<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!