Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA
Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA
Economic Effects of Sustainable Sanitation - SuSanA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case Study Kampala<br />
Landlord units: conventional UDDTs that are constructed by the landlords in the<br />
compounds.<br />
Public units: central UDDTs combined with collection tanks.<br />
The urine from the various toilet facilities, listed above, is collected in jerrycans. The<br />
jerrycans are not only used for the collection but also for the transport. They are abundantly<br />
available in Uganda, either new or second hand (former frying oil jerrycans). Since the<br />
emptying <strong>of</strong> the individual toilets with a tank truck is not feasible, due to bad accessibility and<br />
high costs, the alternative is to allocate collection tanks throughout the slum area, where<br />
people deliver the jerrycans to (probably with simple auxiliaries like a handcart). They empty<br />
the jerrycans into the tanks and take them back for reuse. In this way the accessibility for a<br />
tank truck as well as the optimum location for the delivery in terms <strong>of</strong> minimised distance to<br />
the houses are taken into consideration. As already mentioned above, the collection tanks are<br />
combined with public units, further on referred to as collection points, that are located in<br />
areas, where high activity due to trade and commerce can be found. The collection points on<br />
the one hand improve the sanitation situation <strong>of</strong> adjacent areas. On the other hand they create<br />
income opportunities for the unit operators. Popular locations would for instance be markets.<br />
The separation <strong>of</strong> human excreta and the delivery <strong>of</strong> the urine should be motivated by<br />
incentives 57 paid at the collection points. The most feasible solution seems to be attaching a<br />
value to each jerrycan that is delivered and a certain quality (e.g. pH value) is assured, to<br />
prevent dilution with water. With this incentive scheme private toilet owners as well as youth<br />
groups 58 or organised small collection enterprises can undertake the task <strong>of</strong> delivering and<br />
thus generate income. The more someone delivers, the more income can be generated.<br />
Private Company Level<br />
The collection points should be contracted by the logistics company and operated and<br />
maintained by one slum resident that is also in charge for handing out the incentives. In order<br />
to assure a sufficient storage time and to minimise the size <strong>of</strong> the collection points in the<br />
slums, a central storage site needs to be established. From the various collection points in the<br />
slum the urine is delivered with tank trucks to the storage site on a daily basis. Due to<br />
economies <strong>of</strong> scale, the biggest trucks available in Uganda having a capacity <strong>of</strong> 10 000 l were<br />
identified being the most viable option.<br />
Since the period for sanitising urine through storage for agricultural reuse is recommended to<br />
be not less than one month, the storage site itself has to accommodate at least 30 storage<br />
tanks 59 (WHO, 2006, p. 70). One tank is filled up every day and after a period <strong>of</strong> one month<br />
the tank having been filled up first, is ready for distribution to the farmers.<br />
57 Incentives are one way to trigger behavioural change (Mosler and Tobias, 2007).<br />
58 There are positive experiences reported from Nairobi, where youth groups operate public toilets and solid<br />
waste collection services (UNHABITAT, 2007a, p. 154).<br />
59 Crestanks is the local supplier. The maximum volume <strong>of</strong> a tank is 24 000 l.<br />
56