20.01.2013 Views

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2008</strong> CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES<br />

S88<br />

Pancreas and Islet Transplantation<br />

<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Diabetes</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> Expert Committee<br />

The initial draft of this chapter was prepared by Breay W. Paty MD FRCPC, Erin Keely MD FRCPC<br />

and Charlotte McDonald MD FRCPC<br />

KEY MESSAGES<br />

• Pancreas transplant can result in prolonged insulin independence<br />

and a possible reduction in the progression<br />

of secondary complications of diabetes.<br />

• Islet transplant can result in transient insulin independence<br />

and can reliably stabilize blood glucose concentrations<br />

in people with glycemic lability.<br />

• The risks of chronic immunosuppression must be carefully<br />

weighed against the potential benefits of pancreas<br />

or islet transplant for each individual.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Beta cell replacement as a means of restoring endogenous<br />

insulin secretion, either by whole organ pancreas transplant<br />

or islet transplant, has a number of potential advantages over<br />

standard exogenous insulin therapy for the treatment of type<br />

1 diabetes, including improved glycemic control and the<br />

potential for insulin independence. However, any advantages<br />

must be weighed against the risks and adverse effects of surgery<br />

and chronic immunosuppressive therapy that accompany<br />

these treatments. Unfortunately, the absence of data from<br />

randomized controlled trials (RCTs) makes it difficult to<br />

draw firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of these therapies<br />

compared with intensive medical management of diabetes.<br />

Nevertheless, some general recommendations can be<br />

made regarding the role of pancreas and islet transplant in<br />

the context of current clinical experience.<br />

WHOLE PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION<br />

Pancreas transplantation has progressed significantly in terms<br />

of surgical technique and immunosuppression since it was<br />

first introduced in the 1960s (1). It is most commonly categorized<br />

on the basis of the presence or absence of a kidney<br />

transplant and the relative timing of the procedures: simultaneous<br />

pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant; pancreas after<br />

kidney (PAK) transplant; or pancreas transplant alone (PTA),<br />

in the absence of a kidney transplant. Worldwide, noncontrolled<br />

pancreas graft and patient survival rates differ<br />

slightly among these 3 categories (2). However, in the<br />

absence of large RCTs, it is unclear whether these differences<br />

are clinically significant.<br />

Metabolic studies demonstrate a marked improvement in<br />

glycemic control and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) after suc-<br />

cessful whole pancreas transplant, with most recipients<br />

achieving insulin independence that can last for many years<br />

(3,4). A reduction in albuminuria has been shown at 1 year<br />

posttransplant (5). Similarly, improvements in the histologic<br />

changes of diabetic nephropathy have been reported after 5<br />

to 10 years posttransplant (6). Studies also show an improvement<br />

and/or stabilization of diabetic retinopathy (7) after an<br />

initial risk of worsening due to a rapid reduction in glycemia<br />

(8). The benefits of pancreas transplant are less clear in<br />

patients with advanced retinal disease (9). Peripheral sensory<br />

and motor neuropathies have been shown to improve after<br />

pancreas transplant (10,11). Improvements in autonomic<br />

neuropathy are less consistent and may take longer to achieve<br />

(12,13). There is growing evidence that pancreas transplant<br />

improves cardiovascular (CV) function (14) and may reduce<br />

cardiac events (15). However, studies have generally been<br />

small and nonrandomized. It remains uncertain whether pancreas<br />

transplant improves overall mortality rates (16).<br />

Finally, diabetes-related quality of life appears to improve<br />

after pancreas transplant, although overall quality of life may<br />

not change (17).<br />

ISLET TRANSPLANTATION<br />

Islet transplantation is a less invasive procedure than pancreas<br />

transplantation. It involves the infusion of islets isolated from<br />

cadaveric pancreata via the portal vein into the liver (18).<br />

Unlike whole pancreas transplant recipients, most islet transplant<br />

recipients require at least 2 islet infusions to achieve<br />

insulin independence, although there has been recent shortterm<br />

success using single islet donors in some centres (19).<br />

The rate of posttransplant insulin independence at the most<br />

experienced centres is approximately 80% at 1 year, but<br />

declines to about 10% at 5 years (20-22). Rates of insulin<br />

independence may be lower at less experienced centres<br />

(23,24). Most transplant recipients continue to have some<br />

endogenous insulin secretion even after insulin independence<br />

is lost. However, there are very few long-term data<br />

regarding function of the transplanted islets after 5 years.<br />

Most published studies involve islet transplant in the absence<br />

of a kidney transplant (islet transplant alone [ITA]).There is<br />

some evidence suggesting that islet transplant performed at<br />

the same time as a kidney transplant (simultaneous islet kidney<br />

[SIK]) or after a kidney transplant (islet after kidney<br />

[IAK]) may have comparable results (25,26).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!