20.01.2013 Views

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2008</strong> CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES<br />

S172<br />

Continuing to use the cutoff of 10.3 mmol/L postscreen is<br />

reasonable to presume the presence of GDM. Retrospective<br />

studies published since the 2003 guidelines indicate a threshold<br />

of 11.1 mmol/L would give a false positive rate of 7%<br />

for GDM diagnosis (105) and be 79% predictive of GDM<br />

(106). There were increased cesarean delivery or shoulder<br />

dystocia rates once the screening result was ≥11.1 mmol/L,<br />

even if GDM was not diagnosed (106). A1C testing remains<br />

too insensitive (107), and the GDS is a better screening test<br />

than the FPG test (108). A large retrospective cohort study<br />

confirmed that the 7.8 mmol/L cutoff is valid for white people,<br />

but there are minor racial differences (109). These<br />

guidelines for diagnosing GDM are robust in terms of predicting<br />

macrosomia or the need for cesarian delivery (110).<br />

In the presence of a screening value of 7.8 to 10.2 mmol/L,<br />

a 75-g OGTT is indicated, with samples at 0, 1 and 2 h.<br />

Normal PG levels are fasting plasma glucose (FPG)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!