2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>2008</strong> CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES<br />
S20<br />
Organization of <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care<br />
<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Diabetes</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> Expert Committee<br />
The initial draft of this chapter was prepared by Sora Ludwig MD FRCPC,<br />
Maureen Clement MD CCFP, Peggy Dunbar MEd PDt CDE and Jeffrey A. Johnson PhD<br />
KEY MESSAGES<br />
• <strong>Diabetes</strong> care depends upon the daily commitment of<br />
the person with diabetes to self-management practices<br />
with the support of an integrated diabetes healthcare<br />
(DHC) team.<br />
• The DHC team should be multi- and interdisciplinary,<br />
and should establish and sustain a communication network<br />
among the health and community systems needed<br />
in the long-term care of the person with diabetes.<br />
• <strong>Diabetes</strong> care should be systematic and, when possible,<br />
should incorporate organizational interventions such as<br />
electronic databases, automatic reminders for the patient<br />
and DHC team, to enable timely feedback.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
<strong>Diabetes</strong> care depends upon the daily commitment of the<br />
person with diabetes to self-management practices with the<br />
support of an integrated diabetes healthcare (DHC) team<br />
(1-3). Multifaceted interventions by a wide array of healthcare<br />
providers within the DHC team are needed to improve<br />
management, and should be supported by organizational<br />
interventions that promote regular diabetes monitoring<br />
and recall (4). <strong>Diabetes</strong> care should be founded on evidence-based<br />
clinical practice guidelines and be continuous,<br />
planned and equitable in terms of access. <strong>Diabetes</strong> programs<br />
and services should be community-based, culturally and<br />
socially appropriate, and respectful of age, gender and<br />
socioeconomic conditions.<br />
DHC TEAM<br />
The DHC team should be multi- and interdisciplinary. It<br />
should establish and sustain a communication network<br />
among the health and community systems needed in the<br />
long-term care of the person with diabetes (1-3,5-7). The<br />
person with diabetes and his or her family are central members<br />
of the DHC team. Family support has been shown to<br />
benefit the person with diabetes (8).<br />
The core DHC team includes the family physician and/or<br />
specialist, and the diabetes educators (nurse and dietitian)<br />
(3,5-7). The membership of the team is extensive and<br />
includes numerous disciplines. A variety of individual and<br />
community healthcare supports, in particular psychological<br />
support, can improve glycemic control when part of usual<br />
diabetes care (9). Flexibility in the operation of the DHC<br />
team is important. Changes in the core team, such as adding<br />
a team member, active participation by >1 discipline, and<br />
role expansion, have been shown to be associated with<br />
improved clinical outcomes (10,11).<br />
The DHC team provides comprehensive, shared care that<br />
is collaborative in nature. This approach has been shown to<br />
increase the commitment and participation of the person<br />
with diabetes, and recognizes and enhances the role and<br />
practices of all members of the team (12-15).<br />
The family physician’s role is unique as the first, and at<br />
times, the principal medical contact for the person with diabetes.<br />
Family physicians can provide continuity of care for<br />
the person with diabetes, and provide care in the context of<br />
the family unit (16). This unique provider relationship can<br />
also provide opportunities to assist other family members<br />
who may be at risk for developing type 2 diabetes.<br />
In some circumstances, this role may be shared with or<br />
assumed by a diabetes specialist (4,17,18). Studies suggest<br />
that diabetes-related outcomes are improved if medical care<br />
provided by the family physician is influenced by a diabetes<br />
specialist (18).This influence can vary from indirect input by<br />
the specialist as an opinion leader to direct involvement as<br />
part of a collaborative care model (4,19). Other effective<br />
interventions include the opportunity for input into qualityimprovement<br />
working groups and direct feedback on<br />
processes and outcomes (20).<br />
SELF-MANAGEMENT<br />
<strong>Diabetes</strong> self-management is most effective when ongoing<br />
diabetes education and comprehensive care occur together<br />
(21-23). Effective diabetes self-management programs have<br />
been demonstrated to improve glycated hemoglobin (A1C)<br />
values (23-25).<br />
<strong>Diabetes</strong> education must support self-management<br />
through approaches that promote informed, independent<br />
decisions relating to the individual’s diabetes management.<br />
These approaches have been shown to improve patient<br />
adherence to treatment recommendations (26). Self-management<br />
education should include problem-solving,<br />
goal-setting and active participation in decision-making.<br />
This includes supporting the learner in interpreting and<br />
acting on the results of self-monitoring of blood glucose;<br />
making informed management decisions about insulin,