2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
type 2 diabetes. Although originally designed as a secondary<br />
prevention trial, the protocol underwent several changes,<br />
including the addition of subjects without known CAD, and<br />
the eventual switch of all patients with known CAD to openlabel<br />
lipid-lowering medication. Mean LDL-C reduction over<br />
4 years in the atorvastatin group was 29% vs. placebo<br />
(p 90 000 statin-treated subjects<br />
indicated that for every 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL-C<br />
there was an approximately 20% reduction in CVD events,<br />
regardless of baseline LDL-C. The proportional reductions<br />
were very similar in all subgroups, including those with diabetes<br />
without pre-existing vascular disease (28). Although<br />
this linear relationship between the proportional CVD risk<br />
reduction and LDL-C lowering would suggest that there is<br />
no lower limit of LDL-C or specified LDL-C target (as the<br />
authors suggest), the clinical trial evidence summarized<br />
above would suggest that a target LDL-C of ≤2.0 mmol/L is<br />
currently the most appropriate target for high-risk individuals.<br />
This target is achievable in the vast majority of people<br />
with either a statin alone or a statin in combination with a<br />
second agent, such as a cholesterol absorption inhibitor. For<br />
those with an on-treatment LDL-C of 2.0 to 2.5 mmol/L,<br />
the physician should use clinical judgement as to whether<br />
additional LDL-C lowering is required.<br />
Table 1 summarizes recommended treatment targets.<br />
Tables 2A and 2B summarize considerations that should guide<br />
the choice of pharmacologic agent(s) to treat dyslipidemia.<br />
People with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (particularly<br />
in the context of the metabolic syndrome) are at significant<br />
risk for the development of CVD. Indeed, some<br />
studies suggest that their vascular risk is almost as high as<br />
individuals with type 2 diabetes (29). No clinical trial of<br />
lipid-lowering agents has been conducted exclusively in<br />
people with IGT; however, given their increased CV risk,<br />
one can consider treating this population to the same targets<br />
as people with diabetes (30). To reduce the CV morbidity<br />
Table 1. Lipid targets for individuals with<br />
diabetes at high risk for CVD<br />
Index Target value<br />
Primary target: LDL-C ≤2.0 mmol/L*<br />
Secondary target:TC/HDL-C ratio 80 years (especially<br />
women); small body frame and frailty; higher dose of statin;<br />
multisystem diseases (e.g. chronic renal insufficiency due to<br />
diabetes); multiple medications; hypothyroidism; perioperative<br />
periods; alcohol abuse; excessive grapefruit juice consumption;<br />
and specific concomitant medications such as fibrates (especially<br />
gemfibrozil) (refer to specific statin package inserts for<br />
others) (47)<br />
† Listed in alphabetical order<br />
HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol<br />
LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol<br />
TG = triglyceride<br />
Drugs of choice<br />
to lower LDL-C.<br />
At higher doses,<br />
modest<br />
TG-lowering<br />
effects and<br />
HDL-C–raising<br />
effects<br />
Note: Physicians should refer to the most current edition<br />
of Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (<strong>Canadian</strong><br />
Pharmacists <strong>Association</strong>, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) for product<br />
monographs and complete prescribing information.<br />
S109<br />
COMPLICATIONS AND COMORBIDITIES