20.01.2013 Views

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines - Canadian Diabetes Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

type 2 diabetes. Although originally designed as a secondary<br />

prevention trial, the protocol underwent several changes,<br />

including the addition of subjects without known CAD, and<br />

the eventual switch of all patients with known CAD to openlabel<br />

lipid-lowering medication. Mean LDL-C reduction over<br />

4 years in the atorvastatin group was 29% vs. placebo<br />

(p 90 000 statin-treated subjects<br />

indicated that for every 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL-C<br />

there was an approximately 20% reduction in CVD events,<br />

regardless of baseline LDL-C. The proportional reductions<br />

were very similar in all subgroups, including those with diabetes<br />

without pre-existing vascular disease (28). Although<br />

this linear relationship between the proportional CVD risk<br />

reduction and LDL-C lowering would suggest that there is<br />

no lower limit of LDL-C or specified LDL-C target (as the<br />

authors suggest), the clinical trial evidence summarized<br />

above would suggest that a target LDL-C of ≤2.0 mmol/L is<br />

currently the most appropriate target for high-risk individuals.<br />

This target is achievable in the vast majority of people<br />

with either a statin alone or a statin in combination with a<br />

second agent, such as a cholesterol absorption inhibitor. For<br />

those with an on-treatment LDL-C of 2.0 to 2.5 mmol/L,<br />

the physician should use clinical judgement as to whether<br />

additional LDL-C lowering is required.<br />

Table 1 summarizes recommended treatment targets.<br />

Tables 2A and 2B summarize considerations that should guide<br />

the choice of pharmacologic agent(s) to treat dyslipidemia.<br />

People with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (particularly<br />

in the context of the metabolic syndrome) are at significant<br />

risk for the development of CVD. Indeed, some<br />

studies suggest that their vascular risk is almost as high as<br />

individuals with type 2 diabetes (29). No clinical trial of<br />

lipid-lowering agents has been conducted exclusively in<br />

people with IGT; however, given their increased CV risk,<br />

one can consider treating this population to the same targets<br />

as people with diabetes (30). To reduce the CV morbidity<br />

Table 1. Lipid targets for individuals with<br />

diabetes at high risk for CVD<br />

Index Target value<br />

Primary target: LDL-C ≤2.0 mmol/L*<br />

Secondary target:TC/HDL-C ratio 80 years (especially<br />

women); small body frame and frailty; higher dose of statin;<br />

multisystem diseases (e.g. chronic renal insufficiency due to<br />

diabetes); multiple medications; hypothyroidism; perioperative<br />

periods; alcohol abuse; excessive grapefruit juice consumption;<br />

and specific concomitant medications such as fibrates (especially<br />

gemfibrozil) (refer to specific statin package inserts for<br />

others) (47)<br />

† Listed in alphabetical order<br />

HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol<br />

LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol<br />

TG = triglyceride<br />

Drugs of choice<br />

to lower LDL-C.<br />

At higher doses,<br />

modest<br />

TG-lowering<br />

effects and<br />

HDL-C–raising<br />

effects<br />

Note: Physicians should refer to the most current edition<br />

of Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (<strong>Canadian</strong><br />

Pharmacists <strong>Association</strong>, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) for product<br />

monographs and complete prescribing information.<br />

S109<br />

COMPLICATIONS AND COMORBIDITIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!