critical analysis of the absence of interior - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

B.1 CAAD Software used in Interior Architecture Software Name Software Company Website 20-20 20*20 Technologies www.2020technologies.com/ 3D Home Architect Broderbund http://www.3dhaonline.com/ 3D Studio MAX AutoDesk www.autodesk.com/3dsmax/ Adeko Adeko Group www.adeko.com.tr/ Allplan Nemetschek Systems http://www.nemetschek.co.uk/ ArchiCAD Graphisoft www.graphisoft.com/ Arcon Eleco www.arcon-software.com/ AutoCAD AutoDesk Carrara DAZ 3D http://www.daz3d.com/ Corel Draw Corel http://www.corel.com/ Design Workshop Lite Artifice Inc. http://www.artifice.com/ Infowood Design Effective http://www.e-kitchendesign.com/ IntelliCAD IntelliCAD http://www.intellicad.org/ Kareo White CAD http://www.whitecad.com/ Kitchen Draw Kitchen Draw www.kitchendraw.com/ Maya AutoDesk www.autodesk.com/maya/ Microstation Bentley http://www.bentley.com/ Outline 3D Parallel Graphics http://www.outline3d.com/ Photoshop Adobe www.adobe.com/ Rhinoceros Robert McNeel & Ass www.rhino3d.com/ SketchUp Google www.sketchup.com/ 133
B.2 Some Examples of Interior Architectural Drawings 1. A sample interior drawing produced by ‘ArchiCAD’ rendered by Artlantis Retrieved from www.graphisoft.co.nz/.../products/artlantis.aspx 2. A sample interior drawing produced by ‘SketchUp’ Retrieved from http://www.sketchup.com/index.php?id=20&gid=376#top 134
Page 1 and 2:
PROPOSAL FOR A SOFTWARE MODEL BASED
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT PROPOSAL FOR A SOFTWARE MO
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would
Page 7 and 8:
2.4 CAAD Software used in Interior
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Comparison
Page 11 and 12:
Table 4.5 ‘Other’ features of t
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 3.16 Distribution of satisfa
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 3.45 Percentage distribution
Page 17 and 18:
Through the history, interior space
Page 19 and 20:
individual packages. Yet, an agreem
Page 21 and 22:
are chosen for their different purp
Page 23 and 24:
graphics of the old computer system
Page 25 and 26:
group supports the use of CAAD soft
Page 27 and 28:
‘building information modeling’
Page 29 and 30:
in ‘parametric modeling’ is non
Page 31 and 32:
fields, such as; architecture, engi
Page 33 and 34:
2.4.1.1 AutoCAD AutoCAD is a full-f
Page 35 and 36:
plugged into the software. Nonethel
Page 37 and 38:
Due to the limited information abou
Page 39 and 40:
take 2D drawing printouts, one has
Page 41 and 42:
There are available plug-ins, objec
Page 43 and 44:
3. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CAAD SOFTWA
Page 45 and 46:
3D objects include ‘planes’,
Page 47 and 48:
out the plan view of the object int
Page 49 and 50:
Further parts of this study also ex
Page 51 and 52:
Table 3.2 Comparison of ‘transfor
Page 53 and 54:
Next feature is related to ‘rende
Page 55 and 56:
in this section are based on the sa
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3.7 Comparison of ‘transfor
Page 59 and 60:
Table 3.9 Comparison of ‘renderin
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.11 Comparison of features i
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.1.2 Questionnaire Based on the
Page 65 and 66:
Although 25% of students does not u
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
A typical architectural project pro
Page 71 and 72:
Furthermore, in the conceptual desi
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Table 3.15 Reasons of discontent fo
Page 77 and 78:
Table 3.16 Reasons for utilizing a
Page 79 and 80:
Initially, students are questioned
Page 81 and 82:
After confirming the necessity for
Page 83 and 84:
68 Figure 3.22 Distribution of pref
Page 85 and 86:
Table 3.18 Students’ needs in ter
Page 87 and 88:
Among all of the features and attri
Page 89 and 90:
• Although students acknowledged
Page 91 and 92:
of interviewees are specialized in
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
the number of professionals using a
Page 97 and 98: Table 3.21 Reasons for discontent f
Page 99 and 100: Table 3.22 Reasons for utilizing a
Page 101 and 102: Figure 3.33 Percentage distribution
Page 103 and 104: Table 3.25 emphasizes the insuffici
Page 105 and 106: Moreover, unlike students, professi
Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.40 Percentage distribution
Page 109 and 110: 94 Figure 3.44 Distribution of pref
Page 111 and 112: The quality attributes derived from
Page 113 and 114: The findings of the interviews that
Page 115 and 116: 4. PROPOSED MODEL This chapter intr
Page 117 and 118: 4.1 Features of the Proposed Model
Page 119 and 120: Table 4.1 ‘Drawing’ features of
Page 121 and 122: Next, in ‘view’ feature analysi
Page 123 and 124: Table 4.5 ‘Other’ features of t
Page 125 and 126: Table 4.6 ‘Ease of use’ attribu
Page 127 and 128: Finally there exist, some quality a
Page 129 and 130: Besides, the model introduces a new
Page 131 and 132: model should integrate these requir
Page 133 and 134: commonly used interior architectura
Page 135 and 136: BIBLIOGRAPHY 3D Animation Glossary.
Page 137 and 138: Kurman, D. (1998). Sculptor - How t
Page 139 and 140: APPENDICES 124
Page 141 and 142: A.1 Questionnaire Full Name : .....
Page 143 and 144: 14) Would you be interested if you
Page 145 and 146: 7) In the project development phase
Page 147: APPENDIX B 132
Page 151 and 152: 5. A sample bathroom drawing produc
Page 153 and 154: LIST OF TERMS Add Operation Unifies
Page 155 and 156: Layering An operation that helps to
Page 157 and 158: Transformation The process by which
show all

critical analysis of the absence of interior - Bilkent University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?