critical analysis of the absence of interior - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................... ii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ iii ÖZET .......................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... v TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ vi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... xii 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Problem Statement ............................................................................................. 3 1.2 Aim and Scope ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Context and Structure of the Thesis ................................................................... 4 2. COMPUTER AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN............................................. 7 2.1 Development of CAAD ...................................................................................... 7 2.2 Use of CAAD Software in Architecture ........................................................... 10 2.3 Classification of CAAD Software .................................................................... 11 2.3.1 General Purpose Software .......................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Domain Specific Software ......................................................................... 16 vi
2.4 CAAD Software used in Interior Architecture ................................................. 17 2.4.1 Commonly used General Purpose Software .............................................. 17 2.4.1.1 AutoCAD ........................................................................................... 18 2.4.1.2 3D Studio Max ................................................................................... 19 2.4.1.3 ArchiCAD .......................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 Commonly used Domain Specific Software .............................................. 21 2.4.2.1 Giotto .................................................................................................. 21 2.4.2.2 Arcon .................................................................................................. 25 2.4.2.3 WebDekor .......................................................................................... 26 3. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CAAD SOFTWARE USED IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE ..................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Comparative Analysis of Software Packages ................................................... 28 3.1.1 Analysis of CAAD Objects and Operations .............................................. 28 3.1.1.1 CAAD Objects ................................................................................... 29 3.1.1.2 CAAD Operations .............................................................................. 31 3.1.2 Analysis of Features of CAAD Software ................................................... 33 3.1.2.1 General Purpose CAAD Software ...................................................... 34 3.1.2.2 Domain Specific CAAD Software ..................................................... 39 3.1.2.3 Comparison of Features in General Purpose and Domain Specific CAAD Software ............................................................................................. 45 3.2 Analysis of User Preferences ........................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Analysis of Students’ Preferences ............................................................. 47 3.2.1.1 Assumptions ....................................................................................... 47 3.2.1.2 Questionnaire ..................................................................................... 48 3.2.1.3 Sample Groups ................................................................................... 48 3.2.1.4 Findings .............................................................................................. 50 3.2.2 Analysis of Professionals’ Preferences ...................................................... 74 3.2.2.1 Assumptions ....................................................................................... 74 3.2.2.2 Interview ............................................................................................. 75 3.2.2.3 Sample Groups ................................................................................... 75 3.2.2.4 Findings .............................................................................................. 76 vii
Page 1 and 2: PROPOSAL FOR A SOFTWARE MODEL BASED
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT PROPOSAL FOR A SOFTWARE MO
Page 5: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would
Page 9 and 10: LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Comparison
Page 11 and 12: Table 4.5 ‘Other’ features of t
Page 13 and 14: Figure 3.16 Distribution of satisfa
Page 15 and 16: Figure 3.45 Percentage distribution
Page 17 and 18: Through the history, interior space
Page 19 and 20: individual packages. Yet, an agreem
Page 21 and 22: are chosen for their different purp
Page 23 and 24: graphics of the old computer system
Page 25 and 26: group supports the use of CAAD soft
Page 27 and 28: ‘building information modeling’
Page 29 and 30: in ‘parametric modeling’ is non
Page 31 and 32: fields, such as; architecture, engi
Page 33 and 34: 2.4.1.1 AutoCAD AutoCAD is a full-f
Page 35 and 36: plugged into the software. Nonethel
Page 37 and 38: Due to the limited information abou
Page 39 and 40: take 2D drawing printouts, one has
Page 41 and 42: There are available plug-ins, objec
Page 43 and 44: 3. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CAAD SOFTWA
Page 45 and 46: 3D objects include ‘planes’,
Page 47 and 48: out the plan view of the object int
Page 49 and 50: Further parts of this study also ex
Page 51 and 52: Table 3.2 Comparison of ‘transfor
Page 53 and 54: Next feature is related to ‘rende
Page 55 and 56: in this section are based on the sa
Page 57 and 58:
Table 3.7 Comparison of ‘transfor
Page 59 and 60:
Table 3.9 Comparison of ‘renderin
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.11 Comparison of features i
Page 63 and 64:
3.2.1.2 Questionnaire Based on the
Page 65 and 66:
Although 25% of students does not u
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3.6 Percentage distribution
Page 69 and 70:
A typical architectural project pro
Page 71 and 72:
Furthermore, in the conceptual desi
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Table 3.15 Reasons of discontent fo
Page 77 and 78:
Table 3.16 Reasons for utilizing a
Page 79 and 80:
Initially, students are questioned
Page 81 and 82:
After confirming the necessity for
Page 83 and 84:
68 Figure 3.22 Distribution of pref
Page 85 and 86:
Table 3.18 Students’ needs in ter
Page 87 and 88:
Among all of the features and attri
Page 89 and 90:
• Although students acknowledged
Page 91 and 92:
of interviewees are specialized in
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
the number of professionals using a
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3.21 Reasons for discontent f
Page 99 and 100:
Table 3.22 Reasons for utilizing a
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Table 3.25 emphasizes the insuffici
Page 105 and 106:
Moreover, unlike students, professi
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
94 Figure 3.44 Distribution of pref
Page 111 and 112:
The quality attributes derived from
Page 113 and 114:
The findings of the interviews that
Page 115 and 116:
4. PROPOSED MODEL This chapter intr
Page 117 and 118:
4.1 Features of the Proposed Model
Page 119 and 120:
Table 4.1 ‘Drawing’ features of
Page 121 and 122:
Next, in ‘view’ feature analysi
Page 123 and 124:
Table 4.5 ‘Other’ features of t
Page 125 and 126:
Table 4.6 ‘Ease of use’ attribu
Page 127 and 128:
Finally there exist, some quality a
Page 129 and 130:
Besides, the model introduces a new
Page 131 and 132:
model should integrate these requir
Page 133 and 134:
commonly used interior architectura
Page 135 and 136:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 3D Animation Glossary.
Page 137 and 138:
Kurman, D. (1998). Sculptor - How t
Page 139 and 140:
APPENDICES 124
Page 141 and 142:
A.1 Questionnaire Full Name : .....
Page 143 and 144:
14) Would you be interested if you
Page 145 and 146:
7) In the project development phase
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX B 132
Page 149 and 150:
B.2 Some Examples of Interior Archi
Page 151 and 152:
5. A sample bathroom drawing produc
Page 153 and 154:
LIST OF TERMS Add Operation Unifies
Page 155 and 156:
Layering An operation that helps to
Page 157 and 158:
Transformation The process by which
show all

critical analysis of the absence of interior - Bilkent University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?