29.01.2013 Views

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRCA Pearson Eco-Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Zone <strong>District</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> 10 April 2012<br />

Appendices<br />

plan was to serve a group of downtown municipal build<strong>in</strong>gs. The <strong>in</strong>itial ownership model was<br />

seen as either a City owned utility or as a division of ENMAX Corporation, which is the City<br />

owned local electricity Distribution Company.<br />

<strong>District</strong> heat<strong>in</strong>g with CHP is a complementary bus<strong>in</strong>ess to distributed generation which ENMAX<br />

was <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g. Hence, it became natural for ENMAX to take over development of<br />

the DES with a plan to build distributed generation <strong>in</strong> the form of CHP supply<strong>in</strong>g the district<br />

heat<strong>in</strong>g base load.<br />

A parallel path <strong>in</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Green</strong> would be for Enersource to develop the DES. This model,<br />

where the local electricity distribution company was the vehicle that took on a DE development<br />

project was seen mostly <strong>in</strong> Ontario <strong>in</strong> the mid-90’s up to 2003. These were <strong>in</strong> Cornwall and<br />

(from a management perspective) W<strong>in</strong>dsor and Sudbury, as well as <strong>in</strong> Markham and Hamilton.<br />

This type of ownership and operat<strong>in</strong>g model was possible, especially for relatively small projects<br />

because the municipally owned electric utilities had access to capital and could also tap federal<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g, e.g. through the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Furthermore, they had relevant<br />

utility plann<strong>in</strong>g and management skills.<br />

In all those cases, the <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terest arose <strong>in</strong> relation to distributed generation. But hav<strong>in</strong>g DE<br />

as a division of an electric utility can result <strong>in</strong> limitations to growth. DE is not primarily about<br />

distributed generation (DG). It is about heat<strong>in</strong>g and/or cool<strong>in</strong>g, ma<strong>in</strong>ly heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Canada. DG<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form of CHP is just one option for heat generation and not the ma<strong>in</strong> focus of DE<br />

development.<br />

The bus<strong>in</strong>ess dynamics of electricity distribution and DE are different as DE is not regulated<br />

(except <strong>in</strong> BC) and is not a monopoly. DE must compete for customers and must self-generate<br />

or source locally all of its energy. It has a narrower customer base, i.e. a specific group of<br />

commercial build<strong>in</strong>gs and would be a small component of an electric utility, possibly suffer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from its status as a relatively low priority for the larger utility.<br />

In the case of Markham, when Markham Hydro became part of PowerStream owned by<br />

Vaughan, Markham and Barrie, the DES was left with the Town of Markham.<br />

20.1.2 Southeast False Creek<br />

The City of Vancouver has embarked on revitalization of former <strong>in</strong>dustrial lands known as<br />

Southeast False Creek (SFC). Some of the lands are owned by the City.<br />

After consider<strong>in</strong>g other ownership models a Neighbourhood <strong>Energy</strong> Utility (NEU), directly owned<br />

and operated by the City was selected as the preferred option to supply heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> SFC. This<br />

decision may have been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the imperative to commence operations <strong>in</strong> time for the<br />

2010 W<strong>in</strong>ter Olympics.<br />

Another factor favour<strong>in</strong>g public ownership <strong>in</strong> the early stages is that while the Olympic Athletes<br />

Village was committed, the rate of build-out of the rest of SFC was uncerta<strong>in</strong>. The cash flow for<br />

a DES is uncerta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> these circumstances. The DES will become more attractive to private<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment as the market develops over the years.<br />

BC is the only Prov<strong>in</strong>ce where DE is regulated. City owned DES <strong>in</strong> BC, such as the SFC NEU,<br />

are regulated by their respective city governments. DES not under municipal ownership (such<br />

as Central Heat <strong>in</strong> Vancouver and Dockside <strong>Green</strong> <strong>in</strong> Victoria) are regulated by the BC Utilities<br />

Commission.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!