29.01.2013 Views

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

Project Green District Energy Feasibility Study - Partners in Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRCA Pearson Eco-Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Zone <strong>District</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> 10 April 2012<br />

serious problem <strong>in</strong> this case because the relatively large amount of available Capital Cost<br />

Allowance results <strong>in</strong> the assumed 30% average tax rate not be<strong>in</strong>g reached until the 12 th year of<br />

operation.<br />

The model has the capability to either <strong>in</strong>clude CHP, or not, and to take <strong>in</strong>to account any level of<br />

government fund<strong>in</strong>g assistance and any level of <strong>in</strong>tended customer sav<strong>in</strong>gs from BaU selfgeneration<br />

costs. Sensitivity analysis can be performed on specified variances <strong>in</strong> capital,<br />

escalation, gas prices, fixed O&M costs, DES energy rates, DES capacity rates and the level of<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g assistance. The model encompasses multiple phases, each with its own tranche of the<br />

overall f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g package. I Phases beyond Phase 1 are considered speculative due to the<br />

lower portion of customers visited. However, the <strong>Project</strong> IRR was calculated for Phases 1, 2<br />

and 3 for illustrative purposes. This comparison shows that the expansion does not improve the<br />

IRR. This is because, accord<strong>in</strong>g to this very prelim<strong>in</strong>ary analysis, the additional pipe cost more<br />

than off-sets the lower unit cost of add<strong>in</strong>g production capacity. It is possible this could be<br />

improved by more detailed analysis and optimization of CHP.<br />

Phase 1 2 3<br />

IRR 5% 4% 4%<br />

MW Contract Load 13.6 15.5 22.3<br />

8.1 Thermal Revenue Assumptions<br />

Table 18 IRR by Phase & Contract Capacity<br />

The connected customer heat<strong>in</strong>g capacity is based on the results discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2:<br />

Customer Demand. The total projected customer capacity is assumed to be connected <strong>in</strong> two<br />

sub-phases. Table 20 shows the phased heat<strong>in</strong>g capacity. Table 21 shows the phase tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with customers be<strong>in</strong>g connected <strong>in</strong> phases over a period of two years with the first customer<br />

revenues start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2015.<br />

Pearson DES<br />

Capacity (kW)<br />

Installed Contracted<br />

Phase 1 A 8,000 4,825<br />

Phase 1 8,000 8,800<br />

Total 16,000 13,625<br />

Rationale kW<br />

total diversified 11,581<br />

rounded up 12,000<br />

redundant boiler 4,000<br />

total capacity 16,000<br />

Table 19 Thermal Capacity Build-up<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!