29.01.2013 Views

Dance Mapping - Arts Council England

Dance Mapping - Arts Council England

Dance Mapping - Arts Council England

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Given the dependence of much of the dance field in <strong>England</strong> on public funding support, this<br />

perspective, termed the ‘resource dependence perspective’, is potentially critical in<br />

understanding the dance environment, the ecology and resulting economy.<br />

Pfeffer and Salancik examine the phenomena of ‘externally controlled organisations’ those<br />

that are dependent on their environments:<br />

‘To survive organisations require resources. Typically acquiring resources means the<br />

organisation must interact with others who control those resources. In that sense<br />

organisations depend on their environments. Because the organisation does not control the<br />

resources it needs, resource acquisition may be problematic and uncertain. Others who<br />

control resources may be undependable, particularly when resources are scarce.’ 6<br />

This perspective is an important one both for a dance field heavily dependent on public<br />

support and for the organisations that manage and allocate this support. It highlights the<br />

fragility and the uncertainty that the field experiences as a result of its external dependency.<br />

Within an organisational field there is strong evidence to suggest that a process of<br />

homogenisation occurs:<br />

‘Once disparate organisations in the same line of business are structured into an actual field<br />

(as we argue, by competition, the state or the professions), powerful forces emerge that lead<br />

them to become more similar to one another.’ 7<br />

Many of our dance companies and agencies ‘look’ similar and operate with a similar business<br />

model. Di Maggio and Powell (1991) suggest several factors that create this homogenisation<br />

and call the concept isomorphism. Isomorphism is a constraining process that forces one unit<br />

in a population to resemble other units that face the same set of environmental conditions<br />

(Hawley 1968). Institutional isomorphism occurs when organisations compete, not just for<br />

resources and customers, but for political power and legitimacy. This process can be applied<br />

to dance.<br />

Di Maggio and Powell suggest that isomorphism occurs through three mechanisms:<br />

1. Coercive isomorphism results from both formal and informal pressures on<br />

organisations by other organisations upon which they are dependent. In other words<br />

organisations respond to external pressure in order to maintain their resource base.<br />

This can be evidenced in responses to <strong>Arts</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>England</strong>’s requirements of<br />

regularly funded organisations.<br />

2. Mimetic isomorphism results from imitation and standard responses to uncertainty. In<br />

other words they model themselves on other organisations.<br />

6 Pfeffer and Salancik (2003) p 258<br />

7 Di Maggio and Powell (1991) p 65<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!