Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5<br />
5.2 Rotor Manufacturing<br />
5.2.1 Shape Deposition Manufacturing<br />
Three different methods have been used in the manufacturing of the rotor prototypes.<br />
The smaller rotors are fabricated by the Rapid Prototyping Laboratory at Stan<strong>for</strong>d<br />
University. The rotors constructed of epoxy resin have been built using the Shape<br />
Deposition Manufacturing (SDM) process [31]. A pictorial summary of this method is<br />
shown in Figure 5.1. This method can yield very accurate geometries during<br />
manufacturing within certain limitations, but in the case of these micro-rotors, the<br />
accuracy of the specified geometry after h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> use has proven to be a problem.<br />
Each blade has a minimum thickness of only 20 mils, but the desired camberline is<br />
accurately reproduced as seen in Figure 5.2. The blade airfoil geometry is the result of<br />
the two-dimensional airfoil optimization at Re = 6000. The NACA four-digit thickness<br />
distribution is clearly not reproduced in this case. The desire to minimize section<br />
thickness is tempered by manufacturing minimum gage constraints. If the design<br />
exceeds these minimums the tooling <strong>for</strong>ces may de<strong>for</strong>m or tear away the part. The trade<br />
is then between a thicker airfoil section with a more conventional thickness distribution,<br />
or a constant thickness section at minimum gage. The results of Chapter 3 indicate that<br />
the latter is preferred. A second cross-section, in this case a NACA 4402 camberline, is<br />
shown in Figure 5.3. In both cases the constant thickness regions are approximately 2%<br />
chord, representing this minimum gage constraint. In this case, some shaping of the<br />
leading <strong>and</strong> trailing edge regions is visible. This is achieved by reversing the<br />
manufacturing orientation such that the kerf of the tool at the bounding tool paths<br />
provides beneficial shaping. A comprehensive discussion of the manufacturing aspects<br />
of the mesicopter project is provided by Cheng [32]. It is important to recall that, as<br />
shown in Chapter 3, the camberline is the primary determinant of per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>for</strong> very<br />
thin sections.<br />
76