30.01.2013 Views

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5 Effect of Leading Edge Shape <strong>and</strong> Constant<br />

Thickness Profiles<br />

Chapter 3<br />

Manufacturing limitations at small scales place minimum gage constraints on the design<br />

of highly detailed cross-sections. For very small chord-lengths, the choice must be made<br />

between a traditional airfoil profile, at the expense of greater maximum thickness, or a<br />

constant thickness distribution at the minimum gage. This trade has been explored by<br />

comparing the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the NACA 0002 airfoil with 2% constant thickness plates.<br />

Two leading edge shapes are considered <strong>for</strong> the plates: a leading edge radius <strong>and</strong> a nearly<br />

blunt leading edge. The trailing edge begins as a radius at 99% chord, but is brought to a<br />

point to simplify grid generation. The three edge shapes are shown in Figure 3.16.<br />

Blunt Leading Edge<br />

Trailing Edge<br />

Radiused Leading Edge<br />

FIGURE 3.16 Leading <strong>and</strong> trailing edge shapes used in the generation of constant thickness<br />

airfoils.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!