Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 6<br />
efficiencies are only a part of the total electo-mechanical efficiency of the power <strong>and</strong><br />
propulsion system, battery, wiring harness, <strong>and</strong> controller efficiencies further reduced the<br />
total system efficiency.<br />
For their small size, these motors provide very good per<strong>for</strong>mance both in terms of torque<br />
production <strong>and</strong> high rotational speeds. One limitation of this three-pole stepper motor is<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> additional circuitry to cycle power through the motor coils. This adds mass<br />
to the system; in the final configuration of the 15g vehicle, the controllers represent a<br />
mass fraction of 20% to 30%. Simple circuitry is required to run the motor without<br />
feedback, but the motor efficiency is greatly reduced <strong>and</strong> the maximum RPM under load<br />
drops considerably, in this case from well over 50,000 RPM to below 25,000 RPM.<br />
Feedback is required to account <strong>for</strong> phase lags in the coil/shaft position induced by the<br />
rotational inertia of the shaft <strong>and</strong> rotor, friction, <strong>and</strong> aerodynamic drag. The feedback<br />
circuitry does not add considerably to the mass, but the complexity of the circuity<br />
increases. Small traditional or coreless DC motors, such a pager motors, are not a viable<br />
alternative. Although they require no additional circuity, these motors provide<br />
insufficient torque <strong>and</strong> rotational speed at his scale. Their efficiencies are also typically<br />
much lower, often as low as 5% to 10%. It may be possible that a design-specific<br />
traditional DC motor could be built with per<strong>for</strong>mance closer to the level of the 5mm<br />
Smoovy, but this is beyond the scope of this work.<br />
6.2.2 Astroflight Firefly Motor<br />
The ten inch diameter rotor is powered by the Astroflight Firefly coreless DC motor with<br />
an integrated 16:1 gearbox, Model #800 [39]. This motor <strong>and</strong> gearbox have a combined<br />
mass of 12g <strong>and</strong> a manufacturer’s indicated efficiency of 83%. The Firefly <strong>and</strong> gearbox<br />
are pictured in Figure 6.2. This, once again, is not the total system electro-mechanical<br />
efficiency, simply that of the motor <strong>and</strong> gear box. This factor of two to four increase in<br />
efficiency relative to the 5mm Smoovy illustrates some of the practical difficulties<br />
associated with developing very small flight vehicles. In each case these motors<br />
represent the upper levels of per<strong>for</strong>mance at their respective scales.<br />
98