30.01.2013 Views

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

Aerodynamics and Design for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Flight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The canonical pressure coefficient (C p’) may be expressed as a function of the edge<br />

Chapter 3<br />

velocities (U e ) yielding an expression having no <strong>Reynolds</strong> number dependence <strong>and</strong> a<br />

dominant dependence on the pressure recovery gradient. In this instance, x represents the<br />

distance from the location of minimum pressure.<br />

Thwaites [20] laminar separation criteria takes the <strong>for</strong>m:<br />

This relation is also <strong>Reynolds</strong> number independent <strong>and</strong> dominated by the pressure<br />

recovery gradient. This only become clear upon the substitution of Thwaites’s<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulation <strong>for</strong> the momentum thickness:<br />

x 2 d<br />

Cp' Cp ⎛ ⎞ '<br />

⎠ dx<br />

⎝ 2<br />

≈ 0.0104<br />

θ 2 dUe⎞ ---- ≈ – ⎛ 0.09<br />

⎠ ⎝ ν dx<br />

θ<br />

x<br />

2 0.45ν<br />

=<br />

6<br />

Ue 0<br />

------------- Ue d<br />

Both of these <strong>for</strong>mulations support the concept that the large growth in boundary layer<br />

thickness that accompanies a reduction in <strong>Reynolds</strong> number is potentially beneficial to<br />

lifting per<strong>for</strong>mance due to a reduction in the adverse pressure recovery gradient.<br />

∫<br />

5 x<br />

(3.1)<br />

(3.2)<br />

(3.3)<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!